GeMS validation of OF24-01_FortCollins.gdb

File written by GeMS_ValidateDatabase.py, version of 02/19/2025
Wed Oct 29 17:24:35 2025
Runtime parameters
Database path: C:\Data\Pangaea\CGS\2024FtCollins\CO_2024_OF-24-01_FortCollins\OF-24-01_FortCollins\OF-24-01_FortCollins_Database\OF24-01_FortCollins.gdb
Output directory: C:\Data\Pangaea\CGS\2024FtCollins\CO_2024_OF-24-01_FortCollins
Metadata file: C:\Data\Pangaea\CGS\2024FtCollins\CO_2024_OF-24-01_FortCollins\OF-24-01_FortCollins\FtCollinsGeologiMap-metadata_EAP.xml
Check embedded metadata: False
Skip topology check: False
Refresh GeoMaterialDict: True
Delete extra rows in Glossary and DataSources: False
Compact GDB: True

This database is LEVEL 3 COMPLIANT.

The database-level FGDC metadata are formally correct although the metadata record should be reviewed to verify that it is meaningful.

This file should be accompanied by OF24-01_FortCollins.gdb-ValidationErrors.html and FtCollinsGeologiMap-metadata_EAP.xml_errors.txt in the same directory.

If this database will be submitted to the NGMDB, it also needs to be accompanied by a reviewed Geologic Names report that includes identification of any suggested modifications to Geolex. Use the Geologic Names Check tool to generate that report or provide other documentation of a review.

Back to Top

Contents

Compliance Criteria
Warnings
Content not specified in GeMS schema
Occurrence of MapUnits in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables
Contents of Nonspatial Tables
DataSources
DescriptionOfMapUnits
Glossary
MiscellaneousMapInformation
Database Inventory

Compliance Criteria

LEVEL 1

Criteria for a LEVEL 1 GeMS database are: Databases with a variety of schema may meet these criteria. This script cannot confirm LEVEL 1 compliance.

LEVEL 2--MINIMALLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 2 GeMS database is accompanied by a peer-reviewed Geologic Names report, including identification of suggested modifications to Geolex, and meets the following criteria:
2.1 Has required elements: nonspatial tables DataSources, DescriptionOfMapUnits, GeoMaterialDict; feature dataset GeologicMap with feature classes ContactsAndFaults and MapUnitPolys PASS
2.2 Required fields within required elements are present and correctly defined PASS
2.3 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 2 topology rules: no internal gaps or overlaps in MapUnitPolys, boundaries of MapUnitPolys are covered by ContactsAndFaults PASS
2.4 All map units in MapUnitPolys have entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits table PASS
2.5 No duplicate MapUnit values in DescriptionOfMapUnit table PASS
2.6 Certain field values within required elements have entries in Glossary table PASS
2.7 No duplicate Term values in Glossary table PASS
2.8 All xxxSourceID values in required elements have entries in DataSources table PASS
2.9 No duplicate DataSources_ID values in DataSources table PASS

LEVEL 3--FULLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 3 GeMS database meets these additional criteria:
3.1 Table and field definitions beyond Level 2 conform to GeMS schema PASS
3.2 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 3 topology rules: No ContactsAndFaults overlaps, self-overlaps, or self-intersections. PASS
3.3 No missing required values PASS
3.4 No missing terms in Glossary PASS
3.5 No unnecessary terms in Glossary PASS
3.6 No missing sources in DataSources PASS
3.7 No unnecessary sources in DataSources PASS
3.8 No map units without entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.9 No unnecessary map units in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.10 HierarchyKey values in DescriptionOfMapUnits are unique and well formed PASS
3.11 All values of GeoMaterial are defined in GeoMaterialDict. GeoMaterialDict is as specified in the GeMS standard PASS
3.12 No duplicate _ID values PASS
3.13 No zero-length, whitespace-only, or bad null values PASS

Warnings

There are 43 warnings

Content not specified in GeMS schema

Some of the extensions to the GeMS schema identified here may be necessary to capture geologic content and are entirely appropriate. Please document these extensions in metadata for the database, any accompanying README file, and (if applicable) any transmittal letter that accompanies the dataset. Other extensions may be intermediate datasets, fields, or files that should be deleted before distribution of the database.

Fields


GeochronPoints, Latitude
GeochronPoints, Longitude
GeochronPoints, Depth
GeochronPoints, DepthBelow
GeochronPoints, Aliquots
GeochronPoints, EquivalentDose
GeochronPoints, Overdispersion
GeochronPoints, U
GeochronPoints, Th
GeochronPoints, K2O
GeochronPoints, H2O
GeochronPoints, CosmicDoseRate
GeochronPoints, DoseRate
GeochronPoints, SAROSAge
CMUMapUnitPolys, Notes
CMULines, Label

Tables


CrossSectionA
CrossSectionB
CrossSectionC
CorrelationOfMapUnits
CMUMapUnitPolysAnno
T_1_PointErrors
T_1_DirtyAreas
T_1_LineErrors
T_1_PolyErrors
GenericPoints
DataSourceTemp
MapUnitPolysAnno
GenericPointsAnno
GeochronPointsAnno
OrientationPointsAnno
CSAAnno
CSAGenericPts
CSADHTrace
CSAPoints
CSAMapUnitPolysAnno
CSALines
CSBAnno
CSBDHTrace
CSBLines
CSBGenericPts
CSBPoints
CSBMapUnitPolysAnno
Csec_m_pointsAnno
CSCAnno
CSCDHTrace
CSCGenericPts
CSCPoints
CSCGeologicLinesAnno
CSCMapUnitPolysAnno
CMULinesAnno

Occurrence of MapUnit in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables

MapUnit DescriptionOfMapUnits CrossSectionC CrossSectionA CrossSectionB GeologicMap CorrelationOfMapUnits
Qafo X -- X X X X
Qa1 X -- -- -- X X
Qaf X -- -- -- X X
Qa2 X -- -- -- X X
Kpl X X -- -- X X
Qa2/Qa3 X -- X X -- --
af X -- X X X X
PPsif X X -- -- -- X
Kp X -- X X -- --
Qa3 X -- -- -- X X
TRPly X X -- -- -- X
Kpm X -- -- -- X X
water X -- -- -- X --
JTRmj X X -- -- -- X
no data X X -- -- -- --
Qa4 X -- -- X X X
Kn X X -- -- X X
Kplr X -- -- -- X X
Kpmu X X -- -- -- X
Kph X X -- -- X X
Kcgg X X -- -- -- X
Kpu X -- -- -- X X
Qe X -- -- X X X
Kd X X -- -- -- X
Qa X -- X X X X

Contents of Nonspatial Tables

DataSources

OBJECTIDSourceNotesURLDataSources_ID
8American Geosciences Institute GlossaryGlossaryhttps://glossary.americangeosciences.org/AGI
4Baylor UniversityGeoluminescence Dating Research Labhttps://geosciences.artsandsciences.baylor.edu/about-us/facilities/geoluminescence-dating-research-labBAYLOR
2This studythis studyNoneDAS1
9Online dictionaryNonehttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/geotechnicalDICT1
6Colorado Division of Water ResourcesNonehttps://dwr.colorado.gov/DWR
5Colorado Energy and Carbon Management CommissionNonehttps://ecmc.state.co.us/#/homeECMC
7City of Fort CollinsGeotechnical soil boringNoneFCGEOTECH
1Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.Nonehttps://ngmdb.usgs.gov/fgdc_gds/geolsymstd.phpFGDC-STD-013-2006
10GeMS standardNonehttps://ecmc.state.co.us/#/homeGeMS1
3Colorado Geological Survey Land Use ReviewGeotechnical soil boringNoneLUR

DescriptionOfMapUnits

OBJECTIDMapUnitNameFullNameAgeDescriptionHierarchyKeyParagraphStyleLabelSymbolAreaFillRGBAreaFillPatternDescriptionDescriptionSourceIDGeoMaterialGeoMaterialConfidenceDescriptionOfMapUnits_ID
30NoneDESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITSDESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITSNoneNotes on frequently used references and terminology: All reported optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) analysis data are in Table 1 on Plate 2. All colors are from hand samples unless otherwise stated. Website links for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood mapping, Colorado Division of Water Resources (DWR), and Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) are in the reference section. The Cache la Poudre River is referred to as the Poudre River hereafter.00DMUHeading1NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU01
1NoneSURFICIAL UNITSSURFICIAL UNITSNoneNone01DMUHeading1NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU02
2NoneHUMAN-MADE DEPOSITSHUMAN-MADE DEPOSITSNoneNone01-01DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU03
3afArtificial fillArtificial filluppermost HoloceneThe unit consists of clay, silt, sand, gravel, and cobbles deposited as fill or rip-rap. Fill and rip-rap are placed to support roadways and highways, mitigate damage to buildings from natural geologic hazards like expansive soils, construct earthen dams, and during land reclamation practices after the completion of quarrying operations. Much of the area underlain by unit af in the quadrangle is disturbed and reworked areas from active or reclaimed gravel quarries. Artificial fill likely exists below and around human-made structures, even though it may not be mapped in the quadrangle. A good example of this is the eastern edge of Warren Lake Reservoir; houses are constructed on damming material up to the eastern edge of the reservoir, but because there are structures built here, unit af is not mapped. If not placed and compacted properly, areas underlain by unit af may experience hazards related to expansive soils, soil collapse, erosion, and (or) slope failure, especially in areas where the Pierre Shale members are near the surface. Thickness varies but is likely at least 2 m thick below buildings and local roadways and may be as much as 6 m below highways.01-01-01DMUUnit1afaf255-255-255NoneDAS1"Made" or human-engineered landHighDMU04
4NoneALLUVIAL DEPOSITSALLUVIAL DEPOSITSNoneNone01-02DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU05
6Qa1Alluvium oneAlluvium oneUpper HoloceneThe unit is comprised of poorly to moderately sorted, massive, clay, silt, and sand, and clast-supported gravel deposited by the Poudre River. Exposures are poor in the mapped area; in general, deposits are typically light brown to dark brown in color. The unit is most commonly exposed in gravelly and sandy bars present along reaches of the Poudre River that are not modified by quarrying operations. Deposits underlie the modern river and low-lying terraces that are 2 m (or less) above the modern channel. Post-Piney Creek Alluvium was previously mapped underlying the whole modern Poudre River channel (Colton, 1978; Kellogg and others, 2008; Cole and Braddock, 2009; Workman and others, 2018). Most areas underlain by the unit have a 1% annual chance of flooding (Zone AE), and some have a 0.2% annual chance as mapped by FEMA; therefore, these areas may be prone to flooding, erosion, and (or) sediment inundation. The unit is not a likely source of sand or gravel. The unit may be as much as 2 m thick.01-02-01DMUUnit1Qa1Qa1255-255-190130-130-130 602-gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly fine-grainedMediumDMU06
7Qa2Alluvium twoAlluvium twoMiddle to Lower (?) HoloceneThe unit is chiefly comprised of poorly to moderately sorted, massive clay, silt, sand, and clast-supported gravel. Sandy deposits are mostly homogeneous and massive. Discontinuous pebble lenses that are as much as 2.5 cm thick are present locally. Clasts in gravelly deposits are 3 to 5 cm in diameter, in a sandy matrix. The unit is light brown, reddish-brown, or dark brown in color. Many areas underlain by unit Qa2 have been heavily modified by quarrying activities to access the underlying gravel deposits of unit Qa3. Unit Qa2 underlies low-lying terraces as high as 3 m above the Poudre River. A quarry in NW ¼, sec. 33, T. 7 N., R. 68 W. exposes units Qa2 and Qa3. The area is mapped as af because its surface has been heavily reworked, deposits are in the process of being removed, and the area will continue to be modified until it has been reclaimed. In 2023, four OSL samples were collected from in-situ deposits exposed in active quarry walls. Two samples are discussed here, and the others are discussed with unit Qa3 below. Sample FC-SCQ-23-02 was collected from a silty sand Qa2 deposit, approximately 0.6 m below ground surface (bgs). The sample yielded a SAR-OSL age estimate of 6,100 ± 210 yrs. Sample FC-SCQ-23-03 was collected from a sandy lens in a clast-supported gravel deposit, approximately 1.9 m bgs. This sample yielded a SAR-OSL age estimate of 5,085 ± 325 yrs. See the Geologic History on Plate 2 for more discussion. The unit may be a potential source of sand or gravel, though it is typically removed to access the underlying gravelly deposits of unit Qa3. Areas underlain by unit Qa2 may be prone to flooding, erosion, and (or) sediment inundation, especially areas directly adjacent to the Poudre River. Deposits are typically around 2 m thick but may be as much as 4 m thick locally.01-02-02DMUUnit1Qa2Qa2254-246-136215-176-158 random dot fillDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly fine-grainedHighDMU07
5QaAlluviumAlluviumUpper to Lower (?) HoloceneThe unit is comprised chiefly of light brown to brown clay, silt, and sand. Discontinuous gravel lenses may be present locally. The unit is mapped in the valleys of ephemeral drainages, which have incised into unit Qafo. Deposits of Qa are of similar age to units Qa1 and Qa2, but are not geomorphologically differentiable, such as units Qa1 and Qa2. Post-Piney Creek Alluvium has previously been mapped underlying many of these ephemeral drainages (Colton, 1978; Kellogg and others, 2008; Cole and Braddock, 2009; Workman and others, 2018). Areas underlain by the unit may be prone to flooding, sediment inundation, and (or) erosion. Deposits of Qa are not likely sources of sand or gravel. The unit is typically around 2 m thick but may be as much as 5 m thick locally. 01-02-03DMUUnit1QaQa255-255-175NoneDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly fine-grainedHighDMU08
8Qa3Alluvium threeAlluvium threeLower Holocene to Upper PleistoceneUnit Qa3 deposits underlie unit Qa2 along much of the modern Poudre River. Where exposed at the ground surface, unit Qa3 underlies terraces 3 to 8 m above the modern river channel. Unit Qa3 is well exposed in a quarry in NW ¼, sec. 33, T. 7 N., R. 68 W. The area is mapped as unit af because its surface has been heavily reworked, deposits are in the process of being removed, and the area will continue to be modified until it has been reclaimed. Here, the unit is tan, gray, and brown in color. Clast-supported cobble-gravel comprises most of the unit and is interlayered with matrix-supported gravel, sand beds, and pebble-gravel beds. Coarser gravelly alluvium is poorly sorted. Clasts are typically as much as 20 cm in diameter, but may be larger locally, and are subround to round. Clasts are derived from Precambrian bedrock west of the mapped area, with minor sedimentary clasts sourced closer to the mapped area. Pebble-gravel and sand beds are typically as much as 8 cm thick and laterally continuous over several meters. Pebble-gravel beds are moderately to poorly sorted, comprised chiefly of medium to coarse sand and pebbles, and are massive. Sand beds are moderately sorted, contain fine- to coarse-grained sand, generally lack pebbles, and are either planar- or cross-bedded. Iron-oxide and manganese staining are prevalent throughout the deposit. Two samples were collected from the exposure at the quarry located in the NW ¼, sec. 33, T. 7 N., R. 68 W., and analyzed using OSL techniques. In 2023, samples FC-SCQ-23-01 (0.8 m bgs) and FC-SCQ-23-04 (4.3 m bgs) were collected from in-situ alluvium exposed in quarry walls. These samples yielded SAR-OSL age estimates of 9,665 ± 415 yrs and 16,025 ± 975 yrs, respectively. These samples and deposits are discussed in more detail in the Geologic History on Plate 2. Unit Qa3 has previously been mapped as Broadway Alluvium, which is roughly correlative with the later part of the Pinedale glaciation (Colton, 1978; Kellogg and others, 2008; Cole and Braddock, 2009; Workman and others, 2018). The Pinedale glaciation ended by 12 ka while outwash continued until around 10 ka (Holliday, 1987). The unit is a source of gravel. Perched groundwater may be present at the base of the unit where it overlies clayey and shaley members of the Pierre Shale (unit Kp). Where unit Qe overlies unit Qa3 deposits, soils may be prone to collapse. The unit may be as much as 10 m thick locally. 01-02-04DMUUnit1Qa3Qa3254-246-13685-255-0 random dot fillDAS1Alluvial sedimentHighDMU09
31Qa4Alluvium fourAlluvium fourUpper Pleistocene to upper Middle (?) PleistoceneA cutbank in NW ¼, sec. 18, T. 7 N., R. 68 W. exposes 1 m of clast-supported gravel underlying 2 m of sandy alluvium. The deposit is reddish-brown in color. The upper sandy alluvium is comprised chiefly of silt to coarse sand and is massive. Secondary carbonate to a maximum of Stage II is present, indicating the unit is at least late Middle to early Late Pleistocene in age (Machette, 1985; Birkeland, 1999). Gravel clasts in a silt- to sand-matrix comprise the lower part of the deposit and lie beneath the developed soil. Clasts lack carbonate rinds at this location. Clasts are generally up to 15 cm in diameter, but are larger locally, and are typically subround. A weak fining-upward sequence may be present at the contact between the upper sandy alluvium and the underlying gravel; pea-sized gravel and coarse sand are abundant at the contact. The 3 m of alluvium overlies the Pierre Shale (unit Kp), which is exposed at this site. This Qa4 deposit underlies an exposed terrace approximately 9 to 11 m above the modern Poudre River. In other locations, this unit likely underlies higher terraces that are completely mantled by unit Qe. Sample FC-KF-23-01 was collected 2 m bgs, near the contact of the upper fines and lower gravel, and was analyzed using TT-OSL (Thermally Transferred Optically Stimulated Luminescence) techniques. It yielded a SAR-OSL age estimate of 76,820 ± 5,210 yrs and is correlative with marine isotope stage (MIS) 4-5 (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005). This sample predates the Pinedale glaciation (ended by 12 ka; Madole and Shroba, 1979) and post-dates the Bull Lake glaciation (ended by 120 ka; Madole, 1991). Unit Qa4 is correlative with the Louviers Alluvium of Colton (1978), Kellogg and others (2008), Cole and Braddock (2009), and Workman and others (2018). Kellogg and others (2008) included MIS 5-aged deposits (70-130 ka; Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005) and MIS 6-aged deposits (130-190 ka; Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005) as Louviers Alluvium. The deposit at and near this site has previously been mapped as the Broadway Alluvium (Colton, 1978; Kellogg and others, 2008; Cole and Braddock, 2009; Workman and others, 2018). See the Geologic History on Plate 2 for more discussion. The unit may be a source of sand and (or) gravel. Though none are mapped, localized slope failures may initiate at or near the contact of the unit with the underlying bedrock, especially where the underlying bedrock is relatively weak, like unit Kp. Perched groundwater may be present at the base of the unit where it overlies clayey and shaley members of the Pierre Shale (unit Kp). The unit is as much as 6 m thick, according to DWR well logs.01-02-05DMUUnit1NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1Alluvial sedimentHighDMU10
34Qa2/Qa3Alluvium two/Alluvium threeAlluvium two/Alluvium threeMiddle Holocene to Upper PleistoceneShown in cross section only (Plate 2).01-02-06DMUUnit1Qa2/Qa3Qa2/Qa3254-246-136215-176-158 & 85-255-0 random dot fillDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly fine-grainedHighDMU11
9NoneALLUVIUM AND MASS-WASTING DEPOSITSALLUVIUM AND MASS-WASTING DEPOSITSNoneNone01-03DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU12
11QafDebris-flow and alluvial-fan depositsDebris-flow and alluvial-fan depositsHoloceneThere are no outcrops of the unit in the mapped area; however, distinct, fan-shaped landforms are mapped as unit Qaf on the south side of the Poudre River escarpment. As the river incised, it exposed unit Qafo and the underlying members of the Pierre Shale. Subsequently formed ephemeral drainages have incised into unit Qafo during episodic above-average precipitation and runoff, and deposited alluvial-fan and debris-flow deposits at their outlets in the modern Poudre River valley. Colluvium may also be present locally. Debris-flow deposits are typically poorly sorted, matrix-supported gravel or poorly sorted mud, sand, and clay. Alluvial-fan deposits are typically poorly sorted and may contain clay to gravel. Alluvium is typically moderately to well sorted and may be stratified or massive. Colluvium is typically poorly sorted and may be difficult to distinguish between debris flow and alluvial-fan deposits. Areas underlain by the unit may be subject to future debris flow or alluvial-fan processes and (or) flooding. The unit is not a likely source of sand or gravel. Deposits may be as much as 3 m thick, but may be thicker locally.01-03-01DMUUnit1QafQaf255-255-190115-178-255 602-gravelDAS1Debris flows, landslides, and other localized mass-movement sedimentHighDMU13
12QafoOld debris-flow and alluvial-fan depositsOld debris-flow and alluvial-fan depositsMiddle PleistoceneThe unit is not well exposed in the quadrangle, but many DWR logs and geotechnical borings record and describe the deposits. The unit is typically light brown, brown, reddish-brown, or olive-brown in color and is calcareous locally. Deposits are typically either silty clay and clayey silt or consist of sand and gravel. Much of unit Qafo deposits are mantled by unit Qe; however, given the limited exposure and lack of distinguishing morphology in well and geotechnical logs, Qe is mapped with unit Qafo in most of the quadrangle. The unit underlies surfaces at several distinct levels, indicating episodic deposition punctuated by periods of incision, especially by the ancestral Fossil Creek in the southern part of the mapped area, during the Middle Pleistocene (Section A-A’ and Section B-B’, Plate 2). The unit has previously been mapped as Slocum Alluvium (Colton, 1978; Kellogg and others, 2008; Cole and Braddock, 2009; Workman and others, 2018). Deposits underlying the fan-shaped surface in the southwest corner of the quadrangle are either thin (less than 1 m) or have been completely eroded near the apex of the landform. Similar deposits were evaluated in trenches on the Larimer County Landfill property in the Loveland Quadrangle (Lindsey, 2024). Here, no true fluvial gravel deposits were identified. Instead, the deposits were poorly sorted, calcareous, and comprised of clay, sand, and pebble-gravel, interpreted as alluvial fans. Two samples were collected from two trench sites and analyzed using infrared stimulated luminescence techniques. They yielded age estimates of 17.08 ± 1.86 ka and 166.2 ± 21.8 ka (Lindsey, 2024). The latter date correlates with the earlier part of the Bull Lake glaciation (Madole, 1991; Kellogg and others, 2008). Areas, where the unit is mantled by eolian sediment (unit Qe), may experience hazards related to soil collapse. The unit is not a likely source of sand or gravel. Water well and geotechnical logs indicate the unit may be as much as 9 m thick, but is typically 6 m thick or less. 01-03-02DMUUnit1QafoQafo255-255-190230-0-169 50% transparency random dot fillDAS1Debris flows, landslides, and other localized mass-movement sedimentMediumDMU14
13NoneEOLIAN DEPOSITSEOLIAN DEPOSITSNoneNone01-04DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU15
14QeEolian depositsEolian depositsHolocene and Upper Pleistocene (?)The unit is not well exposed in the mapped area, but numerous DWR well logs and geotechnical borings record descriptions of the unit. It is comprised predominantly of silt and sand. Deposits are tan, light-yellowish brown, yellowish-brown, and olive-brown in color, massive, and homogenous. Secondary carbonate is present in older deposits. Deposits are more widespread than what is mapped, but unit Qe is locally discontinuous and contacts between Qe and other surficial deposits are difficult to identify, so they are mapped together in many places (such as unit Qafo). Colton (1978) mapped deflation basins in the northeast portion of the quadrangle that may have been eroded, in part, by wind. Northwest-southeast trending dune crests are also mapped by Colton (1978) in this area. Lidar was used to map deflation basins and dune crests in the mapped area, but topography is muted, so locations are approximate. The presence of dunes indicates a higher concentration of sand in the eolian deposits in this part of the mapped area. Elsewhere, eolian sediment may have a higher concentration of silt. In silt-dominant deposits, lenses of sand and dispersed pebble-gravel are present owing to the periodic reworking of the unit locally. Areas underlain by eolian sediment may be subject to hazards related to soil collapse or expansion, owing to the higher concentrations of clay derived from the Pierra Shale. The unit is not a likely source of sand. DWR wells and geotechnical borings record sandy silt and clay as much as 11 m thick in places, but unit Qe can be much thinner, locally. It is unclear how much thinner. Colton (1978) reports that deflation basins may be directly underlain by bedrock. Lidar imagery interpretation indicates there may be as much as 12 m of eolian sediment in the northeastern part of the mapped area, assuming bedrock is close to the ground surface underlying deflation basins. 01-04-01DMUUnit1QeQe254-249-194NoneDAS1Eolian sedimentHighDMU16
15NoneBEDROCK GEOLOGYBEDROCK GEOLOGYNoneNone02DMUHeading1NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU17
16KpPierre ShalePierre ShaleUpper CretaceousOnly shown on cross-sections A-A’ and B-B’ (Plate 2). All members in the quadrangle are mostly mantled by surficial deposits. Areas underlain by members of the Pierre Shale, especially those with higher proportions of claystone, siltstone, and shale, may be subject to hazards related to expansive soils, collapsible soils, and are easily eroded. Though no landslides are mapped in the quadrangle, slopes underlain by the unit may be subject to landsliding, especially where slopes are greater than 10 degrees, contain higher concentrations of clay, and are overlain by gravelly deposits. Historically, clayey members of the Pierre Shale have been mined for materials to manufacture brick and tile. Larrabee (compiler, 1947) mapped much of the clay-rich Pierre members in the quadrangle as a resource of brick and tile manufacturing materials. 02-01DMUUnit1KpKp153-208-153NoneDAS1Clastic sedimentary rockHighDMU18
17KpuUpper memberUpper memberUpper CretaceousThe unit consists of easily eroded, valley-forming, gray, silty shale interbedded with sandstone. Sandstone interbeds are friable and typically yellow. The unit weathers to grayish green, gray, or light-olive brown soils. Index fossils Baculites clinolobatus, Baculites grandis, Baculites baculus, Baculites eliasi, and Baculites jenseni have been identified by Scott and Cobban (1965). The unit can be as much as 865 m thick in the region (Colton, 1978).02-01-01DMUUnit2KpuKpu137-137-68NoneDAS1Sandstone and mudstoneMediumDMU19
18KplrLarimer, Richard, and Rocky Ridge members and intervening shaleLarimer, Richard, and Rocky Ridge members and intervening shaleUpper CretaceousThe unit underlies low-lying ridges in the quadrangle. It is comprised of yellow- to tan-colored sandstone with interbedded friable shales. Shales are grayish-green, gray, or light-olive brown. Sandstones within the unit are moderately indurated to friable, medium- to coarse-grained, and weakly to very weakly bedded. Concretions containing shell hash are abundant, and Ophiomorpha burrows and other trace fossils are present. The unit contains index fossil ammonite Baculites reesidei (Scott and Cobban, 1965). Clay-rich soils derived from shales in unit Kplr may be prone to hazards related to expansive and collapsible soils. The unit is 71 to 161 m thick (Colton, 1978).02-01-02DMUUnit2KplrKplr153-235-128NoneDAS1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU20
19KpmMiddle memberMiddle memberUpper CretaceousThe unit is comprised chiefly of erodible, valley-forming claystone and sandy siltstone. Claystones and siltstones are typically greenish gray in color. Index fossils Baculites cuneatus, Baculites compressus, Didymoceras cheyennense, Exiteloceras jenneyi, Didymoceras stevensoni, and Didymoceras nebrascense are present in this member (Scott and Cobban, 1965). Bentonite beds are present locally. The unit is as much as 450 m thick in the region (Colton, 1978).02-01-03DMUUnit2KpmKpm158-255-204NoneDAS1Mostly mudstoneMediumDMU21
24KpmuMiddle to Upper members, undividedMiddle to Upper members, undividedUpper CretaceousShown on cross-section C-C’ only (Plate 2).02-01-04DMUUnit2KpmuKpmu200-220-100NoneDAS1Clastic sedimentary rockHighDMU22
20KphHygiene SandstoneHygiene SandstoneUpper CretaceousThe unit is comprised of yellowish-brown, tan, light-gray, or gray sandstone with varying degrees of induration. In the quadrangle, the Hygiene Sandstone is very weakly bedded and moderately friable. Concretions may be present in the lower part of the unit. Siltstones are interbedded with sandstones in the member. The unit underlies ridges in the southern part of the quadrangle, though the unit does not crop out well. Soils derived from the Hygiene Sandstone are typically sandy and yellowish to tan in color. Index fossil ammonites Baculites scotti and Baculites gregoryensis are present in the member (Scott and Cobban, 1965). The unit is 185 to 242 m thick (Colton, 1978). 02-01-05DMUUnit2KphKph128-255-0NoneDAS1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU23
21KplLower memberLower memberUpper CretaceousThe unit is comprised chiefly of dark-olive brown to black shale and sandy shale. Soils derived from the unit are typically greenish brown to olive. The lower member underlies swales in the western part of the quadrangle and is poorly exposed. Bentonite beds are present in the basal part of the unit. Index fossils Baculites perplexus, Baculites asperiformis, Baculites mclearni, and Baculites obtuses are present in the unit (Scott and Cobban, 1965). The unit is as much as 500 m thick in the region (Colton, 1978). 02-01-06DMUUnit2KplKpl153-173-128NoneDAS1Mostly mudstoneHighDMU24
22KnNiobrara FormationNiobrara FormationUpper CretaceousThe Smoky Hill Member of the Niobrara Formation is exposed only in sec. 4, T. 6 N., R. 69 W. on the western edge of the quadrangle. Here, the upper part of the Niobrara is a thinly bedded, fissile, shaley micritic limestone and limey shale. The color of the unit is gray and it weathers to tan. Fossils are absent from this outcrop. The contact with the Pierre Shale is distinguished by the sharp change from gray limestone to black shale. The unit is approximately 79 m thick in the area. 02-02DMUUnit1KnKn235-255-179NoneDAS1Mostly carbonate rockHighDMU25
25KcggCarlile Shale, Greenhorn Limestone, and Graneros Shale, undividedCarlile Shale, Greenhorn Limestone, and Graneros Shale, undividedUpper and Lower CretaceousIncludes the Codell Sandstone. Only shown on cross-section C-C’ (Plate 2). The unit is approximately 165 m thick (Colton, 1978).02-03DMUUnit1KcggKcgg204-255-48NoneDAS1Sedimentary rockHighDMU26
26KdDakota GroupDakota GroupLower CretaceousShown in cross-section C-C’ only (Plate 2). The unit is as much as 88 m thick in the Horsetooth Reservoir quadrangle adjacent to the west (Braddock and others, 1989). 02-04DMUUnit1KdKd205-205-102NoneDAS1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU27
27JTRmjMorrison Formation, Sundance Formation, and Jelm Formation, undividedMorrison Formation, Sundance Formation, and Jelm Formation, undividedUpper Jurassic and Upper TriassicShown in cross-section C-C’ only (Plate 2). The unit is as much as 158 m thick in the Horsetooth Reservoir quadrangle adjacent to the west (Braddock and others, 1989). 02-05DMUUnit1JTRmjJTRmj153-204-204NoneDAS1Sedimentary rockHighDMU28
28TRPlyLykins Formation and Lyons Sandstone, undividedLykins Formation and Lyons Sandstone, undividedTriassic and PermianShown in cross-section C-C’ only (Plate 2). Unit is as much as 192 m thick in the Horsetooth Reservoir quadrangle adjacent to the west (Braddock and others, 1989).02-06DMUUnit1TRPlyTRPly204-222-222NoneDAS1Sedimentary rockHighDMU29
29PPsifSatanka, Ingleside, and Fountain Formations, undividedSatanka, Ingleside, and Fountain Formations, undividedPermian and PennsylvanianShown in cross-section C-C’ only (Plate 2). Unit is as much as 382 m thick in the Horsetooth Reservoir quadrangle adjacent to the west (Braddock and others, 1989). 02-07DMUUnit1PPsifPPsif115-178-255NoneDAS1Sedimentary rockHighDMU30
32waterwaterwaterNoneNone03DMUUnit1Nonewater174-203-248NoneDAS1Water or iceHighDMU31
33no datano datano dataNoneNone04DMUUnit1no datano data255-255-255NoneDAS1Unmapped areaHighDMU32

Glossary

OBJECTIDTermDefinitionDefinitionSourceIDGlossary_ID
22?a punctuation marks used to express doubt or uncertaintyDICT1GLO01
181 SDA statistic used as a measure of the dispersion or variation in a distribution or set of data, equal to the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the deviations from the arithmetic mean.DICT1GLO02
12Agethe length of time during which a being or thing has existed; length of life or existence to the time spoken of or referred toDICT1GLO03
19anticlineA fold, generally convex upward, whose core contains the stratigraphically older rocks.AGIGLO04
24BeddingA measurement convention used to describe the orientation, or attitude, of a planar geologic feature. A feature's strike is the azimuth of an imagined horizontal line across the plane, and its dip is the angle of inclination measured downward from horizontal.AGIGLO05
31BedrockSolid rock present beneath any soil, subsoil, sediment, or other surface cover. In some locations it may be exposed at Earth's surface.AGIGLO06
9boundaryA line that marks the limits of an areaDICT1GLO07
32Cartolinefeatures used to provide context in the cross section illustrationsDAS1GLO08
1certainIdentity of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one can be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation.FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO09
20CGSLURWellCity of Fort Collins geotech boringDAS1GLO10
8contactA geological contact is a boundary which separates one rock body from another. A contact can be formed during deposition, by the intrusion of magma, or through faulting or other deformation of rock beds that brings distinct rock bodies into contact.AGIGLO11
14crossing linefeatures used toprovide context in teh cross section illustrationsDAS1GLO12
33Deflation basinA topographic basin excavated and maintained by wind erosion which removes unconsolidated material.AGIGLO13
25Deposit typeGroupings for surficial units in the CMUDAS1GLO14
5DMUHeading1GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO15
6DMUHeading2GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO16
3DMUUnit1GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO17
4DMUUnit2GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO18
17Dune crestThe highest elevation of a duneAGIGLO19
26DWR WellDivision of Water Resources water well: Wells (bore holes) that penetrate artesian aquifers. Water will rise up the well casing to the pressure level of the aquifer. Artesian flow describes the natural flow to the surface of water from confined aquifers.DWRGLO20
16ELEV_FTA hatch mark shown on the edges of geologic cross sections to denote the elevation in feetDAS1GLO21
15ELEV_MA hatch mark shown on the edges of geologic cross sections to denote the elevation in metersDAS1GLO22
21Geotech WellA well used as part of the investigation process carried out on site prior to construction.DAS1GLO23
34Highof greater degree, amount, cost, value, or content than average, usual, or expectedDICT1GLO34
30leaderfeatures used toprovide context in teh cross section illustrationsDAS1GLO24
28LURLarimer County Land Use Department geotech boringDAS1GLO25
35Mediuma middle condition or degreeDICT1GLO35
27O&G WellAn oil well is a boring in the Earth that is designed to bring petroleum oil hydrocarbons to the surface. Usually some natural gas is released as associated petroleum gas along with the oil. A well that is designed to produce only gas may be termed a gas well.AGIGLO26
23OSLOptically-Stimulated Luminescence is a late Quaternary dating technique used to date the last time quartz sediment was exposed to light. As sediment is transported by wind, water, or ice, it is exposed to sunlight and zeroed of any previous luminescence signal.BAYLORGLO27
29QuaternaryThe most recent period of geologic time that begins about 2.588 million years ago and extends to the present. It follows the Neogene Period and is divided into the Pleistocene (2.588 million years ago to 11.7 thousand years ago) and the Holocene (11.7 thousand years ago to present).AGIGLO28
2questionableIdentity of a feature cannot be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one cannot be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation. For example, IdentityConfidence = questionable is appropriate when a geologist reasons "I can see some kind of planar feature that separates map units in this outcrop, but I cannot be certain if it is a contact or a fault."FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO29
7surfaceThe topographic profile of the cross sectionDICT1GLO30
13synclineA fold of which the core contains the stratigraphically younger rocks; it is generally concave upward.AGIGLO31
10watera colorless, transparent, odorless liquid that forms the seas, lakes, rivers, and rain and is the basis of the fluids of living organisms.DICT1GLO32
11yrthe time taken by the earth to make one revolution around the sunDICT1GLO33

MiscellaneousMapInformation

OBJECTIDMapPropertyMapPropertyValueMiscellaneousMapInformation_ID
11GeoHistoryThe Fort Collins quadrangle spans three physiographic settings: the northern Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains, the northern margin of the Colorado Front Range, and the western edge of the Denver Basin. The city of Fort Collins is mostly within the quadrangle boundaries, as is part of the city of Loveland. The Denver Basin is an asymmetric basin formed during the Laramide Orogeny and is bounded on the west by the Rocky Mountains. The Laramide Orogeny started near the end of the Cretaceous period, contemporaneous with the final transgressions and regressions of the Western Interior Seaway. The final transgressive and regressive sequences are recorded by the sediments comprising the members of the Pierre Shale (unit Kp), Fox Hills Sandstone, and Laramie Formation; the latter two are not mapped in the quadrangle but are present in the Severance quadrangle to the east of the mapped area (Marr and others, 2025). Bedrock in the Fort Collins quadrangle includes the lower (unit Kpl), Hygiene Sandstone (unit Kph), middle (unit Kpm), Larimer, Richard, and Rocky Ridge (unit Kplr), and upper (unit Kpu) members of the Pierre Shale, as well as the upper part of the Niobrara Formation (unit Kn), which is present only along the western border.MMI01
32GeoHistoryBedrock units west of the quadrangle are moderately dipping and resistant units form hogbacks like those elsewhere along the Colorado Front Range. Unit Kn forms low-lying hogbacks close to the western border of the quadrangle and dips at about 25 degrees to the east. Dips decrease quickly to the east. In the southern part of the mapped area, units Kph, Kplr, and Kpu dip approximately 12 to 16 degrees east and strike north-northeast. In the middle and northern parts of the mapped area, units Kplr and Kpu dip approximately 9 to 10 degrees and strike more consistently north. MMI03
43GeoHistoryMinor faulting could account for the slightly steeper dips and the slightly more northeast-trending strike of the units in the southern part of the mapped area. A minor, apparently strike-slip or oblique-slip fault mapped by Braddock and others (1989) may project from the southern part of the Horsetooth Reservoir quadrangle into the Fort Collins quadrangle and could account for the difference in dips between the northern and southern parts of the mapped area. Owing to the weak nature of the lower member of the Pierre Shale, the fault likely attenuates quickly, and, with no opportunities to collect structural data in the area of the fault in the Fort Collins quadrangle because of the poor exposure, the fault is not mapped. In the northern part of the mapped area, Weimer (1996) mapped an anticline and dome, the southern end of which projects into the Fort Collins quadrangle. There are well logs north of the quadrangle that show bedrock dipping shallowly to the east and a marked increase in dip around the area of Weimer’s anticline axis and dome. Workman and others (2018) mapped this structure as a Laramide-aged syncline and anticline pair and that is reflected in cross-section C-C’. The few oil and gas wells in the mapped area are only located near the very southern extent of the structures. There is little control on the precise location and geometry of any structures underlying the quadrangle. MMI04
55GeoHistoryKellogg and others (2008) place the Bull Lake glaciation (marine oxygen isotope stage (MIS) 6) and the associated Louviers Alluvium around 170-120 ka. Madole (1991) considers the Bull Lake glaciation to be 200 to 130 ka. The Louviers Alluvium also includes MIS 5-aged sediment, 70-130 ka (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005; Workman and others, 2018). Kellogg and others (2008) give tentative, relative ages of 390-320 ka and 300-220 ka to the Slocum Alluvium in the Denver area. More geochronology and mapping are necessary to fully constrain the ages of these deposits.MMI05
67GeoHistoryThere are four alluvial units younger than unit Qafo in the mapped area. On cross-section B-B’, possibly three distinct terraces underlain by unit Qa4 are mapped on the northeast side of the Poudre River. Unit Qa3 forms an inset strath terrace relative to unit Qa4. In the Fort Collins quadrangle, and similar to other areas near the foothills of the northern Colorado Piedmont, unit Qa2 subsequently incised Qa3 to create a nested fill terrace, leaving remnants of Qa3 preserved as an unpaired, higher terrace adjacent to the modern Poudre River. Unit Qa1 is currently incising into unit Qa2, leaving low-lying terraces that are underlain by unit Qa2, adjacent to the river.MMI06
78GeoHistoryThese relationships are identified in cross-section B-B’. The single Qa4 deposit mapped on the southwestern side of the Poudre River is likely paired with the youngest (lowest) Qa4 deposit on the northeastern side, owing to similar basal elevations. Interpretations and correlations of these deposits have a high degree of uncertainty because they are buried by eolian deposits (unit Qe) and owing to the proximity to the Box Elder Creek and the Poudre River confluence. The top of the middle terrace, underlain by Qa4 terrace on the north side of the Poudre River (on the east side of cross-section B-B’), is approximately 20 m above the modern Poudre River. Kellogg and others (2008) report that the top of the correlative Louviers Alluvium is around 20 m. Additionally, Kellogg and others (2008) speculate that the Louviers Alluvium (unit Qa4) underlies unit Qe in the quadrangle. The alluvium underlying the highest terrace furthest east on cross-section B-B’ is interpreted as unit Qa4 owing to how closely inset the lower (younger) terraces are. Typically, the next oldest alluvial unit in the sequence, unit Qg1, exists on a strath with bedrock well-exposed from subsequent erosion. Interpretations from DWR well logs indicate that, while the unit does exist on a strath, subsequent erosion and aggradation did not fully expose the bedrock at this location before the next youngest terrace was abandoned. MMI07
89GeoHistoryA cutbank in NW ¼, sec. 18, T. 7 N., R. 68 W., exposes approximately 3 m of unit Qa4 and the underlying Pierre Shale. At this exposure, an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) sample, FC-KF-23-01, was collected approximately 2 m below ground surface (bgs). It yielded a SAR-OSL age estimate of 76,820 ± 5,210 yrs. This age is correlative with later MIS 5, possibly MIS 4 (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005). Deposits of this age do not commonly form the upper parts of terraces along the Front Range and in the northern Piedmont. Colorado Geological Survey work has confirmed that Qa3-aged (MIS 2) sediments typically bury MIS 4, MIS 5, and locally MIS 6 (Bull Lake) deposits. Sampling and OSL dating in the Kersey quadrangle (Lindsey and Palkovic, 2022) and Gowanda quadrangle (Keller and others, 2019) indicate a series of deposits spanning the time between the end of the Bull Lake glaciation (approximately 130 ka; Madole, 1991) and the beginning of the Pinedale glaciation (approximately 30 ka (Nelson and others, 1979) or possibly earlier (Madole and others, 2010)). Some of the intermediate dates, ranging from 42 to 87 ka, indicate that some deposits may be correlative with MIS 3, 4, and 5 (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005). Kellogg and others (2008) mapped MIS 5-aged and MIS 6-aged deposits as the Louviers Alluvium, which is correlative with unit Qa4. MMI08
910GeoHistoryUnit Qa3 is exposed in places adjacent to the Poudre River and its major tributaries, as well as in quarries underlying unit Qa2. Exposed terraces range from 3 to 8 m above the modern Poudre River channel. In the Fort Collins quadrangle, four samples were collected from an exposure in Strang Quarry in the NW ¼, sec. 33, T. 7 N., R. 68 W., and analyzed by OSL techniques. The older two samples, FC-SCQ-23-01 and FC-SCQ-23-04, yielded age estimates of SAR-OSL 9,665 ± 415 yrs and SAR-OSL 16,025 ± 975 yrs, respectively. Sample FC-SCQ-23-04 is correlative with the Pinedale Glaciation, which ended by 12 ka (Madole and Shroba, 1979). An additional, more recent study suggests that complete deglaciation occurred by 14 ka in the Arkansas River valley (Schweinsberg and others, 2020). Sample FC-SCQ-23-01 may be correlative with a period of glacial outwash deposition that occurred as glaciers retreated. Prior studies indicate that Pinedale outwash deposition likely ended around 10 ka (Holliday, 1987; Kellogg and others, 2008).MMI09
1011GeoHistoryThe younger two samples collected from the Strang Quarry, FC-SCQ-23-02 and FC-SCQ-23-03, yielded age estimates of SAR-OSL 6,100 ± 210 yrs and SAR-OSL 5,085 ± 325 yrs, respectively, and both post-date the Pinedale glaciation. These samples and their respective deposits are interpreted as correlative with unit Qa2. However, sample FC-SCQ-23-01 (unit Qa3) is higher in stratigraphic order (0.8 m bgs) than FC-SCQ-23-03 (unit Qa2, 1.9 m bgs). There are two possible explanations for this: 1. Unit Qa2 and unit Qa3 comprise nested terrace deposits and the quarry exposure shows a complex relationship of channel cut and fills throughout the depositional history of these units. While FC-SCQ-23-01 may be higher stratigraphically, these samples were not taken in direct vertical succession and are slightly offset laterally. It is possible that a lower portion of a younger channel cut and fill comprised of unit Qa2 was sampled at site FC-SCQ-23-03, yielding an age estimate of 5,085 ± 325 yrs that appears lower in the stratigraphic sequence than the age estimate from FC-SCQ-23-01, which is 9,665 ± 415 yrs; or, 2. The age estimate is incorrect. Sample FC-SCQ-03 has the highest overdispersion of the OSL samples collected at the Strang Quarry site: 27 ± 4%. Higher overdispersion values (>20%) may indicate multiple age populations owing to partial bleaching of the quartz grains or from sediment mixing (Steve Forman, written commun., 2025). Sample FC-SCQ-23-01 has an overdispersion of 21 ± 3. Option 2 seems most likely because sample FC-SCQ-03 was collected very close to an erosional contact between lower gravelly alluvium generally considered to be unit Qa3 and upper, finer-grained alluvium considered to be Qa2.MMI10
111GeoHazardThe shaley, clayey, and muddy Cretaceous bedrock in the mapped area can contain naturally occurring, high-swell clays. These clays pose a hazard when they are not properly mitigated. Mitigation typically includes over-excavation of the deposit. If these soils are not properly treated, when structures with conventional foundations are built and soils are wetted, the clays will absorb the water and expand. The soil expansion exerts compressional forces that may cause damage to the structure. Additionally, when the clays dry after being wetted, they contract and decrease in volume (referred to as shrink-swell), and structures are not designed to accommodate these volume changes over time. Some Quaternary deposits, such as units Qa and Qe, are fine-grained and loosely consolidated, owing to an excess of interstitial space in the deposit. These deposits are referred to as collapsible soils. If loosely consolidated sediments are wetted and compressed, the interstitial space is reduced irregularly through the deposit. Infrastructure built on collapsible soils may be subject to irregular settlement if these soils are not properly treated and compacted prior to construction. MMI11
132GeoHazardThough none are mapped in the quadrangle, due to the relatively low strength of the clayey members of the Pierre Shale, landslides can occur even on lower gradient slopes, especially where Quaternary deposits overlie bedrock. Several factors can contribute to landslide initiation in these geological conditions: 1. The clayey bedrock tends to be more easily erodible than the overlying Quaternary units, leading to undercut, over-steepened slopes; and, 2. Groundwater accumulating at the contact between Quaternary deposits and underlying clayey, less permeable bedrock can cause a reduction of internal friction of the units, leading to slope destabilization. These slopes can become easily destabilized by human activity that either cuts or erodes the toes of slopes without properly reinforcing or stabilizing the excavation. Unit Qaf consists of alluvial-fan and debris-flow deposits and sediments deposited by floods. Alluvial-fan, debris-flow, and flood processes can carry large sediment loads and clasts large enough to impart considerable damage to infrastructure. In the quadrangle, areas underlain by unit Qaf are prone to flooding, sediment inundation, and erosion. Much of the area underlain by units Qa1 and Qa2 is within the FEMA 1% annual chance of flooding (Zone AE), and some have a 0.2% annual chance floodway (URL link in references). Other areas that may be prone to seasonal flooding include those underlain by unit Qa. Flooding can pose hazards via extensive erosion or sediment inundation. Other areas that may be prone to erosion include areas underlain by easily eroded bedrock, like the shaley and clayey members of the Pierre Shale. MMI13
151GeoHazardSubTitleExpansive and collapsible soils:MMI15
162GeoHazardSubTitleMass-wasting, flooding, and erosion:MMI16
204GeoHistoryMuch of the quadrangle’s bedrock is mantled by surficial sediments deposited repeatedly during the Pleistocene and Holocene. The oldest Quaternary sediments in the mapped area, unit Qafo, were deposited by alluvial-fan processes over broad areas in the western and central portions of the quadrangle. Unit Qafo in the mapped area is correlative with Qafo in the southern adjacent Loveland quadrangle based on morphology and depositional processes. These deposits are mapped as Slocum Alluvium by Colton (1978), Kellogg and others (2008), Cole and Braddock (2009), and Workman and others (2018). Defining a specific age for Middle Pleistocene and older deposits is difficult near the foothills as streams likely undergo repeated cycles of deposition, erosion, and avulsion before an alluvial surface is abandoned (Riihimaki and others, 2006). A sample collected from unit Qafo in the Loveland quadrangle and analyzed by infrared stimulated luminescence techniques yielded age estimates of 166.2 ± 21.8 ka (Lindsey, 2024). The age estimate from this sample indicates parts of unit Qafo could be correlative with the Louviers Alluvium (Bull Lake glaciation) of Colton (1978), Kellogg and others (2008), Cole and Braddock (2009), and Workman and others (2018). MMI20
216GeoHistoryUnit Qafo underlies fan surfaces at several levels in the landscape, indicating ancestral drainages likely experienced several distinct periods of deposition and erosion, with younger deposits underlying lower surfaces in the landscape. Since the depositional surfaces were abandoned, periodic downcutting has formed minor, ephemeral channels that dissect fan surfaces and flow into the Cache la Poudre River (hereafter referred to as the Poudre River). These ephemeral streams have and continue to deposit alluvial sediments, mapped as Qa, in and near the bases of their channels. MMI21
241ResourcesThe quadrangle lies outside of any major oil and gas and groundwater producing areas. The Wattenberg Field, a world-class oil and gas-producing area, lies east and southeast of the mapped area (Weimer, 1996). The major bedrock aquifer-bearing units are also located outside the mapped area, to the east; however, local, perched groundwater may be present in Quaternary units that overlie clayey and shaley members of the Pierre Shale. The clays in the bedrock unit function as natural barriers to downward groundwater movement. The Poudre River channel is heavily modified by human activity and quarrying of the stream’s gravelly alluvium is extensive. Quarrying operations typically target the gravelly alluvium of unit Qa3. Reclaimed quarries span the length of the channel in the mapped area and now serve as fishing ponds and wildlife habitat. The quarried aggregate is used in road base and construction operations in the region. Units Qafo and Qa2 may be local sources of gravel or sand aggregate; however, unit Qa2 is often treated as overburden in quarrying operations and removed to access the underlying gravel. Additionally, the gravel of unit Qafo may not be extensive enough or clean enough to be economically viable. Schwochow and others (1974) list parts of unit Qafo as an A2 deposit and Qa2 as an F1 deposit. A2 deposits are alluvial-fan deposits that are “gently sloping, fan-shaped deposits of gravel, sand, silt, and clay produced by a stream that issued or issues from a narrow valley or point source onto an open plain or valley. Includes erosional remnants of fan deposits.” and there may be gravel with significant silt, clay, and rock with calcium carbonate. F1 deposits are floodplain deposits that may have clean gravel aggregate sources. Units Qa, Qaf, Qe, and Qa1 are not likely sources of sand or gravel aggregate because they are not typically well-sorted and are too limited in extent to serve as commercially viable resources. MMI24
25ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe following people provided a detailed review that benefited these mappers and map products extensively: Ralph Shroba (U.S. Geological Survey Emeritus and CGS employee), John Singleton (Associate Professor, Colorado State University), Joanna Redwine (STATEMAP Program Manager), and Matt Mogan (CGS Director and State Geologist). Caitlin Bernier (Pangaea Geospatial) performed map layout and production. Steve Forman (Baylor University Geoluminescence Lab) performed OSL analysis. Todd Juhasz and other staff with the City of Fort Collins Natural Areas helped these authors with Natural Areas permits and land access. Todd Juergens and other employees with Larimer County helped coordinate access to quarry exposures which allowed for geochronology sampling and provided important data to the project. Scott Benton, Dave Betley, and other staff with the City of Fort Collins provided detailed geotechnical data that help supplement areas that were not field-accessible. MMI25
26Map ProductionContacts are difficult to identify in the field given how extensive human development is in the Fort Collins area. Many contacts were mapped using 1-m resolution lidar-derived maps and 2- to 5-ft contours. The authors used well-log and boring-log data to estimate some unit contacts and develop cross-sections. Well and boring location accuracy is unknown but assumed to be relatively good. Wells and borings are projected to the cross-section lines. With limited surface exposure of Quaternary and bedrock units, the cross-sections are largely illustrative and may not be accurate, locally.MMI26
2712GeoHistoryUnit Qa1 underlies the modern Poudre River and some very low-lying (1 to 2 m-high) terraces adjacent to the channel in the river’s floodplain. Much of the lower river valley has been modified and quarried for gravel. Eolian sediment (unit Qe) has been deposited and reworked periodically by later eolian processes and (or) fluvial transport, through the Holocene and possibly during the Late Pleistocene. Subtle dune crests in the northeastern part of the mapped area indicate a northwest to southeast wind direction. These deposits, given the presence of dune features, likely have a higher concentration of sand than other eolian deposits in the quadrangle. MMI27
28Ref1Birkeland, P.W., 1999, Soil and Geomorphology, Third Edition: Oxford University Press, 430 p.MMI28
29Ref2Braddock, W.A., Calvert, R.H., O’Connor, J.T., and Sann, G.A., 1989, Geologic map of the Horsetooth Reservoir quadrangle, Larimer County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1625, scale 1:24,000. https://doi.org/10.3133/gq1625MMI29
30Ref3CO DWR (Colorado Division of Water Resources), 2023, Driller’s logs incorporated with water-well permits. https://dwr.colorado.gov/services/data-information/gisMMI30
31Ref4CO ECMC (Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission), 2023, Colorado oil and gas Commission data download: Colorado oil and gas Commission, monthly production by county. https://cogccmap.state.co.us/cogcc_gis_online/MMI31
32Ref5Cole, J.C., and Braddock, W.A., 2009, Geologic map of the Estes Park 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, north-central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Map SIM 3039, scale 1:100,000. http://doi.org/10.3133/sim3039MMI32
33Ref6Colton, R.B., 1978, Geologic map of the Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley area, Front Range urban corridor, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-855-G, scale 1:100,000. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_9734.htmMMI33
34Ref7FEMA, FEMA flood map service center: access in February 2023 at: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/homeMMI34
35Ref8Galbraith, R.F., and Roberts, R.G., 2012, Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating – An overview and some recommendations: Quaternary Geochronology, v. 11, p. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.020MMI35
36Ref9Holliday, V.T.,1987, Geoarchaeology and late Quaternary geomorphology of the middle South Platte River, northeastern Colorado: Geoarchaeology, v. 2, p. 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.3340020404MMI36
37Ref10Keller, S.M., Lindsey, K.O., and Morgan, M.L., 2019, Geologic map of the Gowanda quadrangle, Weld County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey, OF-19-02, scale 1:24,000. https://doi.org/10.58783/cgs.of1902.jukd7298MMI37
38Ref11Kellogg, K.S., Shroba, R.R., Bryant, Bruce, Premo, W.R., 2008, Geologic map of the Denver West 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, North-Central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Map 2000, 1:100,000. http://doi.org/10.3133/sim3000MMI38
39Ref12Larrabee (compiler), D.M., Clabaugh, S.E., Griffitts, W.R., Fischer, E.C., Fox, E.L., Bryson, R.P., Weeks, R.A., Varnes, D.J., and Rolnick, L.S., 1947, Construction materials and nonmetallic mineral resources of Colorado: Missouri Basin Study, no. 10, scale 1:500,000. https://doi.org/10.3133/mb10MMI39
40Ref13Liang, P., and Forman, S.L., 2019, LDAC – An excel-based program for luminescence equivalent dose and burial age calculations: Ancient TL, v. 37, no. 2.MMI40
41Ref14Lindsey, K.O., 2024, Geologic map of the Loveland quadrangle, Larimer County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey, OF-23-03, scale 1:24,000. https://doi.org/10.58783/cgs.of2303.lvwf5542MMI41
42Ref15Lindsey, K.O., and Palkovic, M.J., 2022, Geologic map of the Kersey quadrangle, Weld County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey, OF-20-06, scale 1:24,000. https://doi.org/10.58783/cgs.of2006.vdlh3013MMI42
43Ref16Lisiecki, L.E., and Raymo, M.E., 2005, A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records: Paleoceanography, v. 20, PA1003, 17 p. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071MMI43
44Ref17Machette, M.N., 1985, Calcic soils of the southwestern United States: Geological Society of America, Special Paper 203, 22 p. https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE203-p1MMI44
45Ref18Madole, R.F., 1991, Colorado Piedmont, in Wayne, W.J., ed., Quaternary geology of the Northern Great Plains, Chap.15 of Morrison, R.B., ed., Quaternary non glacial geology -conterminous United States: Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, v. K-2, p. 456-462.MMI45
46Ref19Madole, R.F., Honke, Jeffrey, and Langdon, P.G., 2010, Evidence from the Front Range, Colorado, indicates that Pinedale glaciation began before 31,000 yr ago: Geological Society of America, Abstracts and Programs, v. 42, no. 5, p. 363.MMI46
47Ref20Madole, R.F., and Shroba, R.R., 1979, Till sequence and soil development in the North St. Vrain drainage basin, east slope, Front Range, Colorado, in Ethridge, F.G., ed., Northern Front Range and northwest Denver Basin, Colorado: Geological Society of America Field Guide, Rocky Mountain Section, Field Trip 3, p. 123‒178.MMI47
48Ref21Marr, A.E., Perman, E.A., and Lindsey, K.O., 2025, Geologic map of the Severance quadrangle, Weld County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey, OF-24-03, scale 1:24,000. https://doi.org/10.58783/cgs.of2403.shre2846MMI48
49Ref22Murray, A.S., and Wintle, A.G., 2003, The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol – Potential for improvements in reliability: Radiation Measurements, v. 37, no. 4-5, p. 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00053-2MMI49
50Ref23Nelson, A.R., Millington, A.C., Andrews, J.T., and Nichols, H., 1979, Radiocarbon-dated upper Pleistocene glacial sequence, Fraser Valley, Colorado Front Range: Geology, v. 7, p. 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1979)7%3C410:RUPGSF%3E2.0.CO;2MMI50
51Ref24Prescott, J.R., and Hutton, J.T., 1994, Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: Radiation Measurements, v. 23, p. 497-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4487(94)90086-MMI51
52Ref25Riihimaki, C.A., Anderson, R.S., Safran, E.B., Dethier, D.P., Finkel, R.C., and Bierman, P.R., 2006, Longevity and progressive abandonment of the Rocky Flats surface, Front Range, Colorado: Geomorphology, v. 78, p. 265-278. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.035MMI52
53Ref26Schweinsberg, A.D., Briner, J.P., Licciardi, J.M., Shroba, R.R., and Leonard, E.M., 2020, Cosmogenic 10Be exposure dating of Bull Lake and Pinedale moraine sequences in the Upper Arkansas River valley, Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA: Quaternary Research, v. 97, 15 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/qua.2020.21MMI53
54Ref27Schwochow, S.D., Shroba, R.R., and Wicklein, P.C., 1974, Sand, gravel, and quarry aggregate resources of the Colorado Front Range counties: Colorado Geological Survey, Special Publication 5-A, 43 p., 3 plates, scale 1:250,000. https://doi.org/10.58783/cgs.sp05a.yksn6531MMI54
55Ref28Scott, G.R., and Cobban, W.A., 1965, Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale between Jarre Creek and Loveland, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigations Map I-439, scale 1:48,000. http://doi.org/10.3133/i439MMI55
56Ref29Weimer, 1996, Guide to petroleum geology and Laramide orogeny, Denver Basin and Front Range, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin 51, 133 p. https://doi.org/10.58783/cgs.b51.bsvl1261MMI56
57Ref30Wintle, A.G., and Murray, A.S., 2006, A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols: Radiation Measurements, v. 41, no. 4, p. 369-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.001MMI57
58Ref31Workman, J.B., Cole, J.C., Shroba, R.R., Kellogg, K.S., and Premo, W.R., 2018, Geologic map of the Fort Collins 30’x60’ quadrangle, Larimer and Jackson counties, Colorado, and Albany and Laramie counties, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Map 3399, scale 1:100,000. https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3399MMI58

Database Inventory

This summary of database content is provided as a convenience to GIS analysts, reviewers, and others. It is not part of the GeMS compliance criteria.

DataSources, nonspatial table, 10 rows
DescriptionOfMapUnits, nonspatial table, 32 rows
GeoMaterialDict, nonspatial table, 101 rows
Glossary, nonspatial table, 35 rows
MiscellaneousMapInformation, nonspatial table, 50 rows
GeologicMap, feature dataset
OverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 0 rows
ContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 901 rows
GeologicLines, simple polyline feature class, 11 rows
CartographicLines, simple polyline feature class, 3 rows
OrientationPoints, simple point feature class, 9 rows
GenericPoints, simple point feature class, 38 rows
MapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 354 rows
DataSourceTemp, simple polygon feature class, 1 rows
MapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 134 rows
GenericPointsAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 36 rows
GeochronPointsAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 5 rows
OrientationPointsAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 11 rows
GeochronPoints, simple point feature class, 5 rows
DataSourcePolys, simple polygon feature class, 1 rows
CrossSectionA, feature dataset
CSAMapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 14 rows
CSAContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 35 rows
CSAAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 4 rows
CSAGenericPts, simple point feature class, 16 rows
CSADHTrace, simple polyline feature class, 16 rows
CSAPoints, simple point feature class, 13 rows
CSAMapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 15 rows
CSALines, simple polyline feature class, 5 rows
CrossSectionB, feature dataset
CSBMapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 13 rows
CSBContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 27 rows
CSBAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 4 rows
CSBDHTrace, simple polyline feature class, 16 rows
CSBLines, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows
CSBGenericPts, simple point feature class, 16 rows
CSBPoints, simple point feature class, 9 rows
CSBMapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 14 rows
CrossSectionC, feature dataset
CSCContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 25 rows
CSCMapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 11 rows
Csec_m_pointsAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 21 rows
CSCAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 4 rows
CSCDHTrace, simple polyline feature class, 4 rows
CSCGenericPts, simple point feature class, 4 rows
CSCPoints, simple point feature class, 12 rows
CSCGeologicLines, simple polyline feature class, 2 rows
CSCGeologicLinesAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 1 rows
CSCMapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 11 rows
CorrelationOfMapUnits, feature dataset
CMUMapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 27 rows
CMULines, simple polyline feature class, 77 rows
CMULinesAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 30 rows
CMUMapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 30 rows
T_1_PointErrors, simple point feature class, 0 rows
T_1_DirtyAreas, simple polygon feature class, 4 rows
T_1_LineErrors, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows
T_1_PolyErrors, simple polygon feature class, 0 rows