GeMS validation of OF23-01_Badger_Wash.gdb

File written by GeMS_ValidateDatabase.py, version of 3/28/2024
Tue Oct 15 11:00:56 2024
Runtime parameters
Database path: C:\Data\Pangaea\CGS\2023BadgerWash\2_EditedData\OF23-01_Badger_Wash.gdb
Output directory: C:\Data\Pangaea\CGS\2023BadgerWash\validation
Metadata file: C:\Data\Pangaea\CGS\2023BadgerWash\OF-23-01_BadgerWash\OF-23-01_BadgerWash_Publication\OF-23-01_BadgerWash-metadata_EAP_2.xml
Check embedded metadata: False
Skip topology check: False
Refresh GeoMaterialDict: True
Delete extra rows in Glossary and DataSources: False
Compact GDB: True

This database is LEVEL 3 COMPLIANT.

The database-level FGDC metadata are formally correct although the metadata record should be reviewed to verify that it is meaningful.

This file should be accompanied by OF23-01_Badger_Wash.gdb-ValidationErrors.html and OF-23-01_BadgerWash-metadata_EAP_2.xml_errors.txt in the same directory.

If this database will be submitted to the NGMDB, it also needs to be accompanied by a reviewed Geologic Names report that includes identification of any suggested modifications to Geolex. Use the Geologic Names Check tool to generate that report or provide other documentation of a review.

Back to Top

Contents

Compliance Criteria
Warnings
Content not specified in GeMS schema
Occurrence of MapUnits in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables
Contents of Nonspatial Tables
DataSources
DescriptionOfMapUnits
Glossary
MiscellaneousMapInformation
Database Inventory

Compliance Criteria

LEVEL 1

Criteria for a LEVEL 1 GeMS database are: Databases with a variety of schema may meet these criteria. This script cannot confirm LEVEL 1 compliance.

LEVEL 2--MINIMALLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 2 GeMS database is accompanied by a peer-reviewed Geologic Names report, including identification of suggested modifications to Geolex, and meets the following criteria:
2.1 Has required elements: nonspatial tables DataSources, DescriptionOfMapUnits, GeoMaterialDict; feature dataset GeologicMap with feature classes ContactsAndFaults and MapUnitPolys PASS
2.2 Required fields within required elements are present and correctly defined PASS
2.3 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 2 topology rules: no internal gaps or overlaps in MapUnitPolys, boundaries of MapUnitPolys are covered by ContactsAndFaults PASS
2.4 All map units in MapUnitPolys have entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits table PASS
2.5 No duplicate MapUnit values in DescriptionOfMapUnit table PASS
2.6 Certain field values within required elements have entries in Glossary table PASS
2.7 No duplicate Term values in Glossary table PASS
2.8 All xxxSourceID values in required elements have entries in DataSources table PASS
2.9 No duplicate DataSources_ID values in DataSources table PASS

LEVEL 3--FULLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 3 GeMS database meets these additional criteria:
3.1 Table and field definitions beyond Level 2 conform to GeMS schema PASS
3.2 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 3 topology rules: No ContactsAndFaults overlaps, self-overlaps, or self-intersections. PASS
3.3 No missing required values PASS
3.4 No missing terms in Glossary PASS
3.5 No unnecessary terms in Glossary PASS
3.6 No missing sources in DataSources PASS
3.7 No unnecessary sources in DataSources PASS
3.8 No map units without entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.9 No unnecessary map units in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.10 HierarchyKey values in DescriptionOfMapUnits are unique and well formed PASS
3.11 All values of GeoMaterial are defined in GeoMaterialDict. GeoMaterialDict is as specified in the GeMS standard PASS
3.12 No duplicate _ID values PASS
3.13 No zero-length, whitespace-only, or bad null values PASS

Warnings

There are 6 warnings

Content not specified in GeMS schema

Some of the extensions to the GeMS schema identified here may be necessary to capture geologic content and are entirely appropriate. Please document these extensions in metadata for the database, any accompanying README file, and (if applicable) any transmittal letter that accompanies the dataset. Other extensions may be intermediate datasets, fields, or files that should be deleted before distribution of the database.

Fields


GeochronPoints, Aliquots
GeochronPoints, GrainSize
GeochronPoints, EquivDose
GeochronPoints, Overdispersion
GeochronPoints, U
GeochronPoints, Th
GeochronPoints, K2O
GeochronPoints, Rb
GeochronPoints, H2O
GeochronPoints, CosmicDose
GeochronPoints, DoseRate
GeochronPoints, SAR_OSL
GeochronPoints, Depth
CSAGenericPoints, Rotation

Tables


CrossSectionA
CorrelationOfMapUnit
MapUnitPolysAnno
MapUnitAnno
GenericPtAnno
GenericPoints
OrientationPointsAnno
Line
GeochronPointsAnno
CSADHTrace
CSAGenericPoints
CSAMapUnitPolysAnno
CMU_Anno

Occurrence of MapUnit in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables

MapUnit DescriptionOfMapUnits CrossSectionA GeologicMap CorrelationOfMapUnit
Kmp X X X X
Xu X X -- X
Qaco X -- X X
af X -- X X
Qeo X -- X X
Qac X -- X X
Qc X -- X X
water X -- X --
Kml X X -- X
Qa X -- X X
Kms X X X X
Qamf X -- X X
Qaf1 X -- X X
Qg1 X -- X X
Qaf4 X -- X X
Qg3 X -- X X
Qco X -- X X
Jm X X -- X
Kdb X X -- X
Qaf5 X -- X X
Mz X X -- X
Qg2 X -- X X
Qaf2 X -- X X
Qaf3 X -- X X
Qaf7 X -- X X
Qaf6 X -- X X
Kmu X X X X

Contents of Nonspatial Tables

DataSources

OBJECTIDSourceNotesURLDataSources_ID
9Baylor Geoluminescence Dating Resarch LabNonehttps://geosciences.artsandsciences.baylor.edu/about-us/facilities/geoluminescence-dating-research-labBAYLOR1
2This studyNoneNoneDAS1
5Online dictionaryNonehttps://dictionary.com/DICT1
6Colorado Division of Water ResourcesNonehttps://dwr.colorado.gov/DWR1
7Energy and Carbon Management CommissionNonehttps://ecmc.state.co.us/#/homeECMC1
1Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.Nonehttps://ngmdb.usgs.gov/fgdc_gds/geolsymstd.phpFGDC-STD-013-2006
4GeMS standardNonehttps://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Info/standards/GeMS/GeMS1
3Online geologic dictionaryNonehttps://geology.com/geology-dictionary.shtmlGEODICT1
8US Geological SurveyNonehttps://www.usgs.govUSGS1

DescriptionOfMapUnits

OBJECTIDMapUnitNameFullNameAgeDescriptionHierarchyKeyParagraphStyleLabelSymbolAreaFillRGBAreaFillPatternDescriptionDescriptionSourceIDGeoMaterialGeoMaterialConfidenceDescriptionOfMapUnits_ID
1NoneSURFICIAL DEPOSITSSURFICIAL DEPOSITSNoneMap units are described using the following classifications: grain sizes from Wentworth (1922); thickness of bedding terms codified in the current classification of the Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM); and carbonate content of rock and calcic soils judged by intensity of effervescence (fizz or bubbling) that resulted from the application of 10% hydrochloric acid (HCl) to a rock or soil sample in the field. Pedogenic calcic soil development stages are from Machette (1985). Surficial deposits may include color classifications in parenthesis from the Globe pocket guide for the Identification of Soil Colors that uses the Munsell color system.01DMUHeading1NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU01
2NoneHUMAN-MADE DEPOSITSHUMAN-MADE DEPOSITSNoneNone01.01DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU02
3afArtifical fillArtifical fillUppermost HoloceneGravel, sand, silt, and clay emplaced as fill to construct road, canal, and dam embankments, or any other human-made fills. The unit includes natural sediments and landfills composed of unknown materials. Fills may be engineered or uncontrolled. Their compositions and properties are varied. The unit locally may include disturbed land, excavations, overburden spoils related to landfill sites, and gravel or borrow pits.01.01.01DMUUnit1afaf255-255-255NoneDAS1"Made" or human-engineered landHighDMU03
4NoneALLUVIAL DEPOSITSALLUVIAL DEPOSITSNoneNone01.02DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU04
5QaAlluviumAlluviumUpper and Middle HoloceneTan-gray, interlaminated to very thinly bedded, very fine to fine-grained sand and sandy to silty clay. The unit typically covers the floor of active drainage channels and swales within meanders incised in alluvial mudflow and mud-fan valley fill deposits (Qamf) and shale bedrock. Unit may locally contain pebble to boulder gravelly lenses. Rocks also typically litter gully floors, which are transported during flood events or by debris flows. The unit includes up to three meandering terrace deposits above the active channel floor. The lowest, from 1.5 m to 2 m above the channel floor, exhibits active surface flood scour morphology. This unit is susceptible to periodic flash flooding and deposition of debris flows.01.02.01DMUUnit1QaQa255-255-115NoneDAS1Alluvial sedimentHighDMU05
7NoneAlluvial gravel depositsAlluvial gravel depositsNoneDeposits are linear remnants of river terrace treads that approximate the longitudinal profile of the major creeks of the quadrangle: Prairie Canyon Creek, West Salt Creek, and East Salt Creek. These creek watersheds extend northward, off map, to valleys and canyons incised through the Book Cliffs into the Roan Plateau. The predominate deposit is a fluvial, sorted, and imbricated cobbly gravel with scattered small boulders (<1 m). Well-sorted sand lenses are locally present. Clasts are primarily sandstone; the provenance being Upper Cretaceous Mesa Verde Group (Iles and Williams Fork formations) and underlying marine sandstones of the upper part of the Mancos Shale exposed in the Book Cliffs. However, there are small amounts (<5%) of other lithologies including red-colored coal-fire clinker and pebbles composed of chert, petrified wood, and igneous and metamorphic rocks. These pebbles are reworked from terrestrial conglomeritic channels and beds within the Paleogene Ohio Creek and Wasatch formations exposed in the Roan Plateau above the Mesa Verde rocks. Cobble-sized sandstone clast shapes are low sphericity, but moderately to well rounded, with shapes ranging from bladed or slabby to discoid. Except for the lowest gravel (Qg1), the well sorted riverine deposits near the contact with the underlying Mancos Shale or finer-grained mud alluvium are commonly cemented to conglomerate that locally forms ledge-type outcrops along the terrace bluff. The deposit also locally contains muddy fine-grained interlaminated to thinly interbedded overbank deposits and channels that contain unsorted bouldery debris flow gravel in a muddy matrix. Alluvial deposits have been a historic gravel resources in the map area.01.03DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU06
8Qg1Alluvial gravel oneAlluvial gravel oneUpper PleistoceneMap unit forms broad fan-shaped mesas and isolated terrace remnants in the southern third of the map area. The top of the unit averages 18 m above base level. Gravel deposits are unconsolidated and are about 3 m thick. An abandoned gravel pit in this deposit exposed riverine pebbly to cobbly gravel near Old Highway 6&50 on the west bank of West Salt Creek near the confluence with Badger Wash. Unit thickness at the pit is about 2 m.01.03.01DMUUnit1Qg1Qg1255-255-215163-255-155 ESRI 24k Geology 605 BrecciaDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU07
9Qg2Alluvial gravel twoAlluvial gravel twoearly Upper PleistoceneGravel deposits beneath remnants of terrace surfaces are 26 m above the West Salt Creek. The terrace remnants extend to the northern map boundary. Where the deposit is well-sorted riverine gravel within the West Salt Creek valley, the unit is locally well cemented and forms a conglomerate. The durability of the conglomeritic gravel deposit locally prevents erosion of the adjacent shale slope such that deposits of subsequent sheetwash (unit Qaco) locally form low-gradient fans that lap onto the Qg2 unit. Thickness is variable, but maximum observed thickness is 11 m, which included overbank mud and sand sediments underlying the gravel. A clean riverine sand lens was sampled (BW-044 in age table on Plate 2) for optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating. The sample yielded a minimum age of >87,000 years before present (ybp), which suggests deposition during the Bull Lake glaciation (marine isotope stage MIS-5 and MIS-6). In old gravel pits, the thickness of the mined gravel is 3 m.01.03.02DMUUnit1Qg2Qg2255-255-215255-127-127 ESRI 24k Geology 605 BrecciaDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU08
10Qg3Alluvial gravel threeAlluvial gravel threeUpper PleistoceneDeposits of fluvial gravel beneath alluvial terrace surfaces form small mesas that overlie the Smoky Hill Member of the Mancos Shale (Kms) about 45 m above the base level. Deposits are near the southern margin of the map area in what was the paleo-confluence of East and West Salt Creeks. This unit correlates with the off-map deposit of Mack Mesa (Qam2 of White and others, 2015). In old gravel pits, the thickness of the gravel is up to 5 m.01.03.03DMUUnit1Qg3Qg3255-255-21599-167-255 ESRI 24k Geology 605 BrecciaDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU09
36NoneALLUVIAL FAN AND MUDFLOW DEPOSITSALLUVIAL FAN AND MUDFLOW DEPOSITSNoneNone01.04DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly fine-grainedHighDMU10
6QamfAlluvial mudflow and mud-fan depositsAlluvial mudflow and mud-fan depositsHolocene and Upper PleistoceneTan-gray, poorly to moderately sorted, interlaminated to very thinly bedded, unconsolidated, very fine to fine grained, silty to clayey sand. Unit includes Holocene terrace sediments of the modern drainage channels of major creeks and locally includes clay-, silt-, and sand-rich alluvium deposited by tributary streams, alluvial-fan, and hillside slopewash (chiefly sheetwash) sediments. The deposit is locally gravel-bearing; either clast-supported cross-bedded pebbly gravel or matrix-supported pebble gravel clasts dispersed in the deposit. Clasts are derived from reworking of older alluvial gravel and alluvial fan deposits (Qg and Qaf) near adjacent hills and mesas, and rare lenses of entrained cobbles and boulders deposited during floods or by debris flows. The pebble to small boulder (< 40 cm) gravel-sized clasts are predominantly from the Book Cliffs region north of the map area. Sample BW-189 (in age table on Plate 2) was taken 6.7 m below the terrace surface and 1.8 m above the active channel floor for OSL dating that yielded an estimated age of 12,755 ± 615 ybp. Total unit thickness at the sample site was 8.5 m, which is near the maximum thickness of the unit near the main trunk of the West Salt Creek valley (9 m). The unit locally thins to 2 m in broad alluvial fans and flatlands that overlying the Smoky Hill Member of the Mancos Shale (Kms). In southern parts of the map area overlying the Kms bedrock, the deposit locally is altered by agricultural tilling and may locally include shale bedrock residuum. The sediment of this unit may be prone to hydrocompaction settlement (White and Greenman, 2008), expansive (swelling) soils, and (or) dispersion upon wetting. Pseudokarst features such as fissures and small ground openings may be present locally.01.04.01DMUUnit1QamfQamf255-255-190NoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU11
11NoneAlluvial fan depositsAlluvial fan depositsNoneForms aggraded, gently-sloping, alluvial fans that may (locally?) become constrained (and narrow to form?) stream-terrace deposits. More resistant to erosion than the surrounding shale, the units are topographically inverted; subdivided and enumerated based on height of remnant gravel-capped mesas, hilltops, and narrow ridges above modern stream level. Unconsolidated deposits range from very bouldery, unsorted, non-stratified, matrix-supported, gravelly debris-flow deposits to better-sorted, stratified, clast-supported, imbricated, sandy, cobbly gravel deposited by fluvial processes. Clasts are angular to subrounded slabby sandstone that were eroded by the incision of steep-walled gulches cut into the Book Cliffs. Deposits may locally contain boulder levees and channel fill that record debris-flow events. Older units typically have thin mantles composed of light red (Munsell 2.5YR 7/8) loess (< 1m thick) reworked and redeposited chiefly by sheetflow. Unit supports more dense vegetation than the adjacent Mancos Shale. Heights recorded are those of the deepest nearby drainage channels or elevation (m) above mean sea level (AMSL).01.04.02DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU12
12Qaf1Alluvial fan deposits oneAlluvial fan deposits oneLower Holocene and Upper PleistoceneUnit forms low fan and fan remnants adjacent to hills composed of Mancos Shale. Thickness is unknown, but young gullies of Upper Holocene age are incised 3 m into the unit.01.04.02.01DMUUnit1Qaf1Qaf1255-255-190112-168-0 ESRI 24k Geology 607 sandDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU13
13Qaf2Alluvial fan deposits twoAlluvial fan deposits twoUpper PleistoceneUnit forms low-level alluvial fans that extend down from the Book Cliffs to form Qg2 terrace gravel where the valley is constrained by the Prairie Canyon Member of the Mancos Shale (Kmp). Unit is locally mantled with patchy red (Munsell 2.5YR 7/8) silty to very-fine-grained sandy loess. The top of the unit is about 26 m above the creek floor and is 4.5 to 9 m thick.01.04.02.02DMUUnit1Qaf2Qaf2255-255-190255-0-197 ESRI 24k Geology 602 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU14
14Qaf3Alluvial fan deposits threeAlluvial fan deposits threeUpper PleistoceneUnit contains widespread alluvial fans remnants at an approximate elevation of 1,585 m AMSL in the central part of the map area near the northern boundary. Fan surface typically is thinly mantled (<1 m) by reworked, red (Munsell 2.5YR 7/8), loess-rich, sheetwash deposits. Unit has a poorly exposed Bk soil horizon. Clasts exposed at the surface are partially covered with calcic coatings, which likely have Stage II calcic development (Machette, 1985). Unit thickness is variable, but likely does not exceed 3 m. Top of unit Qaf3 is about 15 m above the Qaf2 surface.01.04.02.03DMUUnit1Qaf3Qaf3255-255-1900-112-255 ESRI 24k Geology 602 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU15
15Qaf4Alluvial fan deposits fourAlluvial fan deposits fourUpper PleistoceneUnit forms isolated mesas and ridgelines near the map's northern boundary at an intermediary elevation between the more widespread Qaf3 surfaces and Qaf5 surfaces. Surface of unit Qaf4 is thinly mantled with reworked red (Munsell 2.5YR 7/8) loess. Clasts are typically slabby subangular sandstone clasts eroded from the nearby Book Cliffs and typically have calcic coatings where exposed. Deposit surface is 27 m above the local drainage channel. Top of unit Qaf4 is about 7 m above the top of unit Qaf3.01.04.02.04DMUUnit1Qaf4Qaf4255-255-190255-0-0 ESRI 24k Geology 602 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU16
16Qaf5Alluvial fan deposits fiveAlluvial fan deposits fiveupper Middle PleistoceneUnit occurs as a discontinuous belt of alluvial fan remnants capping isolated hilltops and narrow ridgelines that overlie Mancos Shale near the northeast corner of the map area. Deposit surface elevation at the north map boundary is 1,632 m AMSL and declines to 1,528 m over a 3.7 km distance. A northwest to southeast slope gradient is 28 m/km. The top of unit Qaf5 is about 15 m above the top of unit Qaf4.01.04.02.05DMUUnit1Qaf5Qaf5255-255-19076-230-0 ESRI 24k Geology 602 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU17
17Qaf6Alluvial fan deposits sixAlluvial fan deposits sixupper Middle PleistoceneUnit occurs as remnants of fan gravel that contains small boulders composed of sandstone that caps isolated hilltops and narrow ridgelines underlain by Mancos Shale in the upper margin of the northeast quadrant of the quadrangle. Unit is less than 2 m thick and Mancos Shale residuum is locally exposed at the surface. The southward slope gradient of this alluvial fan surface is 66 m/km. The unit surface elevation is about 10 m above that of unit Qaf5. The surface elevation of unit Qaf6 is like that of the Qaf7 unit near the northern map boundary. However, the steeper gradient places the southern remnants of unit Qaf6 at a lower elevation of unit Qaf7. 01.04.02.06DMUUnit1Qaf6Qaf6255-255-190168-168-0 ESRI 24k Geology 602 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU18
18Qaf7Alluvial fan deposits sevenAlluvial fan deposits sevenMiddle PleistoceneThis conspicuous unit occurs along the west side of the map area and forms high mesas from the north boundary to the south boundary of the quadrangle. Unit consists of heterogeneous alluvial deposits composed of interlaminated silty to sandy clay that is capped by well sorted, imbricated, riverine cobbly gravel that is well-cemented. The latter forms a resistant conglomerate bed that forms a vertical bluff that caps the mesa. The underlying interlaminated alluvial mud beds show evidence of load deformation. The upper conglomerate is well exposed in a vertical bluff along mesa edges. The unit is 15 m thick where the mud unit is exposed. At the location of an old gravel pit in the southwest corner of the map area, the muddy alluvium is not present, and the riverine conglomerate is only 5 m thick. The Lava Creek B tephra (~631 ka, MIS Stage 16-15, dated by Matthews and others (2015)) was not seen in the map area, but was reported in this same unit at two nearby locations on the Bar X Wash quadrangle, 2 km and 4.7 km west of the west map boundary, on each side of Prairie Canyon (written communication, Andres Aslan, Colorado Mesa University, Sept 11, 2008; written communication, Rex Cole, Colorado Mesa University (retired), March 21, 2023). The tephra is in the lower alluvial mud beds below the conglomerate. Unit Qaf7 is about 122 m above the floor of the adjacent Prairie Canyon. Deposit surface in the northwestern part of the map area is 1,617 m AMSL and declines to 1,518 m over a distance of 12.7 km, a north to south downslope gradient of 8 m/km. The surface of the high mesa is mantled with fine-grained red soil (Munsell 2.5YR 6/8) above a ~1 m thick carbonate-rich K horizon that is exposed along the mesa rim. The K horizon likely has stage III+ to IV calcic soil development (Machette, 1985).01.04.02.07DMUUnit1Qaf7Qaf7255-255-190190-210-255 ESRI 24k Geology 602 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedNoneDMU19
19NoneEOLIAN DEPOSITSEOLIAN DEPOSITSNoneNone01.05DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU20
20QeoOld eolian depositsOld eolian depositsUpper PleistoceneLight red to orange-red (Munsell 10YR 6/8 to 2.5YR 7/8) silt, clay, and very fine-grained sand that thinly mantle two gentle slopes underlain by Mancos Shale. Unit was deposited by wind and was reworked by slope processes. Reddish hues may be (likely?) related to soil development. Local chalky-colored exposures along slopes are formed by erosion and exposure of well-developed Bk soil horizons. Very thin deposits (<1 m) and discontinuous mantles of loess on the surfaces of older Qg units, older Qaf units, and unit Qaco were not mapped. Unit Qeo has more extensive vegetation cover than the surrounding hills composed of Mancos Shale. Unit thickness is generally less than 2 m.01.05.01DMUUnit1QeoQeo230-230-0NoneDAS1Eolian sedimentHighDMU21
21NoneALLUVIAL AND COLLUVIAL DEPOSITSALLUVIAL AND COLLUVIAL DEPOSITSNoneNone01.06DMUHeading2NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU22
22QacAlluvial and colluvial deposits, undividedAlluvial and coluvial deposits, undividedHoloceneTan-gray, unconsolidated, poorly sorted to unsorted silt, clay, and sand that is primarily deposited on hillsides and in swales chiefly by sheetwash and mass-movement processes. The deposit locally may contain abundant sandstone chips where sediment is derived from the Prairie Canyon Member of the Mancos Shale (Kmp), or large dispersed pebbles, cobbles, and small boulder-sized sandstone clasts where the sediment is derived from the erosion of older gravel that cap adjacent mesa remnants. Thickness is highly variable and likely does not exceed 2 m.01.06.01DMUUnit1QacQac215-215-158255-0-197 ESRI 24k Geology 601 gravelDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly fine-grainedHighDMU23
23QacoOld alluvial and colluvial deposits, undividedOld alluvial and colluvial deposits, undividedUpper to Middle PleistoceneReddish tan, unconsolidated, silt, clay, and sand with lesser amounts of dispersed, matrix-supported, pebble-sized clasts as well as scattered cobbles and small boulders (<0.5 m) reworked from adjacent and higher older deposits of Qg and Qaf. Deposit may locally contain abundant sandstone disc-shaped chips (up to 1 cm thick and 6 cm wide). Deposits are poorly sorted and very weakly stratified. Sandstone-chip clasts are of local upslope origin (unit Kmp). The deposit accumulated on gentle to moderate slopes (≤10°, but averaging about 4°) where wind and sheetwash processes predominate. Unit forms thin mantles where shale slopes abut against deposits of Qg and Qaf, and atop relict hillside fan surfaces. Unit Qaco locally includes reworked red (Munsell 2.5YR 7/8) loess, and clay and sandstone-chip residuum from slope-derived sediments eroded from unit Kmp bedrock. Exposures are poor, but a chalky-white band along slope breaks are due to a Bk soil horizon. Soil development, reddish hue, and elevation above the adjacent stream levels indicate a late to middle Pleistocene age for the unit. Unit thickness likely does not exceed 2 m. Mancos Shale bedrock residuum may be locally exposed in the unit.01.06.02DMUUnit1QacoQaco255-255-115230-0-0 ESRI 24k Geology 605 brecciaDAS1Alluvial sediment, mostly coarse-grainedHighDMU24
24QcColluvial depositsColluvial depositsHoloceneTan-gray, unsorted, non to very poorly stratified, cobbly gravel-sized rock fragments with minor boulders (<1 m) deposited primarily by gravity on and along the base of steeper slopes near the angle of repose (≤34°). Deposits generally underlie older Qaf-mantled mesas and ridgelines and may locally include conglomerate blocks (eroded from what unit?) down slope of older gravel-capped mesas where conglomeratic intervals outcrop. Deposit has an unsorted clayey sandy matrix that was transported by overland sheet flow that transported relatively fine-grained material. Unit thickness is variable, but is likely less than 3 m.01.06.03DMUUnit1QcQc255-235-175NoneDAS1Colluvium and other widespread mass-movement sedimentHighDMU25
34QcoOlder colluvial depositsOlder colluvial depositsUpper to Middle PleistoceneUnit description is similar to Qc deposits described above, but is older. The rocks in these older, thin colluvial deposits armor shale slopes so that they are more resist to erosion. Differential erosion rates of the shale bedrock and armored surfaces underlain by unit Qco alter the normally uniform shale hillslopes, creating flatiron-shaped facets or irregular slopes below older Qaf deposits that cap the mesas. Deposit typically has a Bk soil horizon and clasts that are exposed in the unit have calcic coatings. Unit thickness is variable, but typically is about 2 m. Shale bedrock residuum may be locally exposed within the unit.01.06.04DMUUnit1QcoQco254-249-194255-127-127 10% ordered stippleDAS1Colluvium and other widespread mass-movement sedimentHighDMU26
25NoneBEDROCK GEOLOGYBEDROCK GEOLOGYNoneSurface bedrock of the Badger Wash quadrangle is composed of upper members of the Mancos Shale. The Mancos Shale in the Badger Wash area contains lithologic unit names that are transitional from Colorado to Utah. Historically, units of the Mancos Shale in Utah have been mapped in northwest Colorado south of the Uinta Basin and into the Grand Valley (Molenaar and Cobban, 1991; Cole and others, 1997). The units used in this map reflects lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic work by the U.S. Geological Survey (Merewether and others, 2006; Ball and others, 2010); as well as recent work by the CGS reported in 1:24,000-scale geologic maps in the nearby Grand Valley, Whitewater, and Delta quadrangles (Livaccari and Hodge, 2009; White and others, 2014; White, 2014; Noe and others, 2015; and White and others, 2015). The recent work correlate coeval informal units of the Mancos Shale with Pierre Shale equivalents along the Front Range as well as with those of Mancos-Mesa Verde National Park area in southwestern Colorado (Leckie and others, 1997). The equivalent Utah Mancos members mapped near the state border (Gualtieri, 1988; Willis, 1994; Cole and others, 1997) are shown below in parentheses. The shale, where exposed, typically contains thin bentonite beds and is heavily fractured and contains fracture fillings composed of secondary gypsum (selenite). Expansive clay minerals promote swelling-soil hazards in shale bedrock as well as in their derived sediments. The "fat" clay (high plasticity) soils become greasy, cohesive, and clump when wetted, making walking and vehicle access difficult.02DMUHeading1NoneNoneNoneNoneDAS1NoneNoneDMU27
26KmuUpper part of the Mancos Shale (upper Blue Gate Member)Upper part of the Mancos Shale (upper Blue Gate Member)Upper CretaceousDark gray to gray black, non-calcareous, broadly banded shale. The shale is finely fissile where weathered, but with depth the shale in outcrop becomes blocky or sub-blocky. Bentonite beds and secondary crystalline gypsum are common. Orange-brown dolomite concretion horizons occur; some are fossiliferous; some individual concretions as large as 2 m in diameter. The lower part of the unit becomes increasingly gray-black and bentonitic. Lowest strata of Unit Kmu is lithostratigraphically equivalent to the Sharon Springs Member as mapped in the North Delta quadrangle (Noe and others, 2015). Basal contact with unit Kms is marked by a downward color change in the shale from gray-black to tan-gray, the common presence of sandstone lamina, and two concretionary horizons just below (~4 m) the top of the Kmp unit. Where exposed, the gray-black shale of unit Kmu typically weathers at the surface to very light gray compared to the more tan-gray, sandy Kmp Member. This Kmu unit does not correlate with the Kmu unit (lower undivided members of the Mancos Shale) of Livaccari and Hodge (2009) in the nearby Fruita quadrangle. Unit Kmu is about 427 m thick.02.01DMUUnit1KmuKmu170-198-129NoneDAS1Mostly mudstoneHighDMU28
27KmpPrairie Canyon MemberPrairie Canyon MemberUpper CretaceousTan-gray to dark-gray, non-calcareous, silty to sandy shale and interlaminated to thinly interbedded, very fine to fine-grained, non- to slightly calcareous sandstone. Thin lenticular to flaser bedding is common. Lenticular sandstone lamina chips typically litter hill slopes; some have wavy pinch-and-swell structure and ichnofossils. A typical sandstone chip is less than 1 cm thick and 6 cm wide, but sandstone beds up to 7 cm thick occur. Unit contains thin bentonite seams and resistant, planar, <1-m thick, orange-brown ferrous dolomite beds. The concretionary dolomite beds have lumpy bases and are laterally discontinuous. These beds are well indurated compared to the sandy shale. They are resistant to weathering and typically form low cuestas and (or) dipslope hillsides. From a type section measured and described in part in Badger Wash map area, Cole and others (1997) formally described this Mancos Shale Member, previously referred to as the “Mancos B.” This sandy unit forms conspicuous, tan-colored, low, dendritically incised hills and ridges in the map area. The unit top, about 4 m below the Kmu contact, contains two horizons that contain large (1 to 2 m) septarian dolomite concretions that contain clear to translucent calcite and locally includes bluish- to cola-colored barite crystals. These concretions are sought by mineral collectors in the Grand Valley. Basal contact with the Smoky Hill Member (Kms) is marked by: the lack of interlaminated sandstone; darker gray color change; the presence of calcareous shale and light-gray shaly limestone beds; and general subdued topography. Unit Kmp is about 306 m thick (Cole and others, 1997).02.02DMUUnit1KmpKmp211-255-190NoneDAS1Sandstone and mudstoneHighDMU29
28KmsSmoky Hill Member (lower Blue Gate Member)Smoky Hill Member (lower Blue Gate Member)Upper CretaceousDark gray to gray-black, finely fissile, speckled, moderately to very calcareous, poorly indurated shale; light-gray, platy to sub-blocky, poorly-to-moderately indurated, shaly limestone; and a lower interval composed of interlaminated, moderately cemented, very fine to fine-grained sandstone. Unit contains sporadic thin (≤ 6 cm) bentonite beds. Specks are predominantly coccoliths and may be concentrated along bedding planes to locally form light-gray interlaminations (~1 mm). Thick-shelled, prismatic Inoceramus fossil fragments are common, typically encrusted with Pseudoperna congesta oysters. The Inoceramus fossils emit a petroliferous odor when freshly broken. Rarely seen are poorly preserved coiled ammonite fossils. The unit is poorly exposed and is typically either covered by a thin mantle of residuum and (or) Qamf deposits. Unit Kms is obscured where agricultural practices have significantly modified the ground surface downslope of the Government Highline Canal. In outcrop, the shale is heavily fractured or split and commonly filled with secondary gypsum (selenite). A sandy interval occurs in the lower third of the unit that is slightly more resistant to weathering and erosion; and forms a subtle topographic ridgeline littered with sandstone chips just north of old Highway 6&50 near the termination of the lower synclinal fold of the Flume Creek monocline (White and others, 2015). Unit Kms is equivalent to the lower Blue Gate member (informal unit of Cole and others, 1997). The surface residuum locally exhibits "popcorn-like" texture formed by shrink-and-swell expansive clays. Swelling soils locally may be a hazard where soils are derived from unit Kms. The basal unit contact is south of the southern map boundary. Total thickness of unit Kms is about 580 m (Cole and others, 1997).02.03DMUUnit1KmsKms125-196-64NoneDAS1Mostly mudstoneHighDMU30
29KmlLower part of the Mancos ShaleLower part of the Mancos Shale (Ferron Sandstone and Tunuck Member)Upper CretaceousIncludes the Montezuma and Juana Lopez members (Ferron Sandstone Member), and the Blue Hill, Coon Springs Sandstone, Bridge Creek Limestone, and Graneros members (Tunuck Member) (White and others, 2015). Shown in cross section only.02.04DMUUnit1KmlKml178-204-46NoneDAS1Mostly mudstoneHighDMU31
30KdbDakota Sandstone and Burro Canyon Formation, undividedDakota Sandstone and Burro Canyon Formation, undividedLower CretaceousShown in cross section only.02.05DMUUnit1KdbKdb178-178-102NoneDAS1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU32
35JmMorrison FormationMorrison FormationUpper JurassicIncludes the following members: Brushy Basin mudstone and sandstone, the Salt Wash sandstone, and the Tidwell mudstone, sandstone, and limestone (Scott and others, 2001; White and others, 2015). Shown in cross section only.02.06DMUUnit1JmJm204-255-230NoneDAS1Mostly mudstoneHighDMU33
31MzFormations of the Middle Jurassic to Upper Triassic age, undividedFormations of the Middle Jurassic to Upper Triassic age, undividedMesozoicIncludes the Wanakah Formation, Entrada Sandstone, Kayenta Formation, Wingate Sandstone, and Chinle Formation (Scott and others, 2001; White and others, 2015). Shown in cross section only.02.07DMUUnit1MzMz168-243-234NoneDAS1Clastic sedimentary rockHighDMU34
32XuPrecambrian rock of the Uncompahgre Uplift, undividedPrecambrian rock of the Uncompahgre Uplift, undividedPaleoproterozoicGneiss and migmatite (Scott and others, 2001). Shown in cross section only. 02.08DMUUnit1XuXu179-153-153NoneDAS1Igneous and metamorphic rockNoneDMU35
33waterwaterwaterHoloceneNone03.01DMUUnit1waterwater190-232-255 outline 0-132-168 NoneDAS1Water or iceHighDMU36

Glossary

OBJECTIDTermDefinitionDefinitionSourceIDGlossary_ID
351 SDA statistic used as a measure of the dispersion or variation in a distribution or set of data, equal to the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the deviations from the arithmetic mean.DICT1GLO01
12Agethe length of time during which a being or thing has existed; length of life or existence to the time spoken of or referred toDICT1GLO02
3anticlineA fold in rock strata with a convex upward shape. The rocks in the core of an anticline are the oldest. Identity and existence certain, location accurateGEODICT1GLO03
16BeddingIn this context, bedding refers to a measurement convention used to describe the orientation, or attitude, of a planar geologic feature. A feature's strike is the azimuth of an imagined horizontal line across the plane, and its dip is the angle of inclination measured downward from horizontal.GEODICT1GLO04
17Bedding1In this context, bedding refers to a measurement convention used to describe the orientation, or attitude, of a planar geologic feature. A feature's strike is the azimuth of an imagined horizontal line across the plane, and its dip is the angle of inclination measured downward from horizontal. In this context, these strike and dips were estimated from LiDAR data.GEODICT1GLO05
33Bedding2In this context, bedding refers to a measurement convention used to describe the orientation, or attitude, of a planar geologic feature. A feature's strike is the azimuth of an imagined horizontal line across the plane, and its dip is the angle of inclination measured downward from horizontal. In this context, these strike and dips were estimated from LiDAR data.GEODICT1GLO06
20borrow pitA pit created to provide earth that can be used as fill at another siteDICT1GLO07
6boundaryA line that marks the limits of an areaDICT1GLO08
1certainIdentity of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one can be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation.FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO09
5contactA geological contact is a boundary which separates one rock body from another. A contact can be formed during deposition, by the intrusion of magma, or through faulting or other deformation of rock beds that brings distinct rock bodies into contact.GEODICT1GLO11
15Cross SectionA graphic representation of the intersection of the geological bodies in the subsurface with a vertical plane of a certain orientation showing relationships between rock unitsGEODICT1GLO12
11Deposit typeGroupings for surficial units in the CMUDAS1GLO13
34DH TraceThe down hole course created by drilling into the subsurfaceDICT1GLO14
8DMUHeading1GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO15
9DMUHeading2GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO16
10DMUUnit1GeMS hierarchy formatting termGeMS1GLO17
29ElevThe vertical distance between a standard reference point, such as sea level, and the top of an object or point on the EarthDICT1GLO19
7faultA fault is a fracture or zone of fractures between two blocks of rock. Faults allow the blocks to move relative to each other; a planar surface of rupture along which geologic units have been fractured and then displaced.GEODICT1GLO20
36Featurea prominent or conspicuous part or characteristicDICT1GLO21
27FltMvmt1Cartographic symbols showing the relative offset on the fault in cross sectionDAS1GLO22
28FltMvmt2Cartographic symbols showing the relative offset on the fault in cross sectionDAS1GLO23
18gravel pitA gravel pit is an open-pit mine for the extraction of gravel.GEODICT1GLO24
32gypsum depositAn accumulation of a widely distributed mineral consisting of aquated calcium sulfate: CaSO4•2H2O . It is the commonest sulfate mineral, and is frequently associated with halite and anhydrite in evaporites, forming thick, extensive beds interstratified with limestone, shale, and clay (esp. in rocks of Permian and Triassic age). Gypsum is soft (hardness of 2 on the Mohs scale); it is white or colorless when pure, but commonly has tints of gray, red, yellow, blue, or brown. It occurs massive (alabaster), fibrous (satin spar), or in monoclinic crystals (selenite) Gypsum is used chiefly as a soil amendment, as a retarder in portland cement, and in making Plaster of Paris. Etymol: Greek "gypsos", "chalk". Syn: gypsite; gyp; plaster stone.GEODICT1GLO25
37Highunusual or considerable in degree, power, intensity, etc. DICT1GLO34
30O&G wellAn oil well is a boring in the Earth that is designed to bring petroleum oil hydrocarbons to the surface. Usually some natural gas is released as associated petroleum gas along with the oil. A well that is designed to produce only gas may be termed a gas well.GEODICT1GLO26
19OSL sample siteOptically-Stimulated Luminescence is a late Quaternary dating technique used to date the last time quartz sediment was exposed to light. As sediment is transported by wind, water, or ice, it is exposed to sunlight and zeroed of any previous luminescence signal.DAS1GLO27
2questionableIdentity of a feature cannot be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one cannot be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation. For example, IdentityConfidence = questionable is appropriate when a geologist reasons "I can see some kind of planar feature that separates map units in this outcrop, but I cannot be certain if it is a contact or a fault."FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO28
22surfaceThe topographic profile of the cross sectionDAS1GLO29
4synclineA trough-shaped fold with youngest strata in the centerGEODICT1GLO30
21watera colorless, transparent, odorless liquid that forms the seas, lakes, rivers, and rain and is the basis of the fluids of living organisms. GEODICT1GLO31
31Water wellWells (bore holes) that penetrate artesian aquifers. Water will rise up the well casing to the pressure level of the aquifer. Artesian flow describes the natural flow to the surface of water from confined aquifers.GEODICT1GLO32
26yrthe time taken by the earth to make one revolution around the sunDICT1GLO33

MiscellaneousMapInformation

OBJECTIDMapPropertyMapPropertyValueMiscellaneousMapInformation_ID
1PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTINGThe Badger Wash quadrangle lies in Mesa and Garfield Counties, Colorado, approximately 24 km northwest of the town of Fruita and 4.4 km east of the Utah border. The quadrangle lies at the northwestern edge of the Grand Valley where agricultural lands are irrigated by the Government Highline Canal. The Grand Valley is a topographically low area of subdued hills and badlands that lie between the Uncompahgre Plateau and the Book Cliffs. Access to the quadrangle map area is best from Old Highway 6&50 to Garfield County Road 201 (Baxter Pass Road) that follows the West Salt Creek valley into the Book Cliffs. The topography in the southern part of the map area consists of wide and subdued flats, low hills, and low (<50-m high) mesas, The small mesas are capped with Pleistocene alluvial-fan and stream terrace gravel, which are now topographically inverted. North of the flat irrigated lands and the canal in the map area, the underlying Mancos Shale bedrock is more sandy and more resistant to weathering and erosion. Shallow dendritic drainage patterns are developed in low hills and ridgelines that rise from 70 to 90 m above the irrigated lands. The major creeks are intermittent or ephemeral. They included Badger Wash and Prairie Canyon creeks that are tributaries of West Salt Creek. The confluence of West Salt and East Salt creeks occurs 1.7 km below the southern map boundary where the Salt Creek thalweg extends an additional 5 km to its confluence with the Colorado River in Ruby Canyon. The highest elevation of the Badger Wash quadrangle is 1,632.5 m above mean sea level (AMSL) at the north-central map boundary on a high narrow mesa capped by rocky and resistant Pleistocene alluvial-fan deposits. The lowest elevation is 1,376.3 m AMSL at the southern map boundary where East Salt Creek flows though the southeastern corner of the map area. The climate is arid and vegetation outside of irrigated areas is sparse. The landscape is comprised in part of adobe-type badlands that are common in the Colorado (Grand), Gunnison, and the Uncompahgre River valleys of west-central Colorado where the Mancos Shale bedrock is exposed. The annual precipitation ranges from 20 to 30 cm (National Centers for Environmental Information).MMI01
2GEOLOGIC SETTINGThe oldest bedrock unit exposed in the map area is the Late Cretaceous Mancos Shale. The marine shale was deposited during the transgression of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway (WIS) (Franczyk and others, 1992). Regressive and transgressive sequences of the western shoreline of the WIS formed the sediments of the Iles and Williams Fork formations of the Mesa Verde Group. These rocks are more resistant to weathering and form the Book Cliffs that are exposed north of the map area. Off map to the south, faulting and monoclinal folding of the northeast front of the Uncompahgre Uplift exposes earlier Mesozoic rocks and Proterozoic basement rocks of the Uncompahgre Plateau in the Colorado National Monument (Scott and others, 2001) and the McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area south of the Colorado River (White and others, 2015). The exposed package of Triassic and Jurassic sedimentary rocks includes the basal Triassic Chinle Formation, which nonconformably overlies Proterozoic basement rocks. This type of unconformity indicates an earlier Pennsylvanian-Permian uplift of the Ancestral Uncompahgre Mountains. Earlier Paleozoic sedimentary rocks that were exposed in the ancestral uplift were subsequently eroded away over millions of years. The Triassic Period ground surface in the Mesozoic Era was beveled to a peneplain eroded down to crystalline Proterozoic basement rocks prior to the deposition of later Mesozoic and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks. These rocks were later uplifted during the Laramide Orogeny when the faulting and folding of the Uncompahgre uplift occurred and formed the present-day Uncompahgre Plateau. The Grand Valley was formed by Late Neogene to Pleistocene erosion and long-term ground lowering by the Colorado River and its tributaries where the less resistant Mancos Shale was at ground surface (Aslan and others, 2019). The structural geology of the Badger Wash quadrangle reflects the regional faulting along the general northwest to southeast trend of the Uncompahgre Uplift. The general dip of the strata is north to northeast towards the Unita and Piceance basins. Structural data were difficult to obtain because of the weathering of the exposed shale bedrock. However, useful attitudes of the bedrock were gained from exposures of tabular sandy dolomite concretionary beds, very thin beds of bentonite, and thinly interbedded sandstone beds of the Prairie Canyon Member. The major structural features in the map area are several subparallel normal faults, shallow folds, and the termination of the Flume Creek monoclinal fold that is expressed in the dip of Mancos Shale near the southwest corner of the quadrangle near Old Highway 6&50. This monocline trend extends northwest from the Mack area and is likely fault cored at depth (White and others, 2015). Field work for this study identified surface faulting, shallow-displacement grabens, and paired anticlines and synclines. These southwest to northeast trending subparallel branch faults were first mapped by Krey (1962). These faults are also shown in the 1:250,000-scale (Cashion, 1973) and 1:100,000-scale (Ellis and Gabaldo, 1989) geologic maps. However, several other subparallel normal faults were identified during the mapping of the Badger Wash quadrangle. Significant structural variation was also noted in exposed bedrock strata within the faulted terrain, as well as localized deformation of strata near faults. Crystalline calcite filling that locally include casts of fault and shear zone slickensides were also observed. The faults trend approximately 70 to 80 degrees (north to northeast) from the general southeast to northwest trend of the folded front of the Uncompahgre Uplift at the Flume Creek monocline.MMI02
3WATER RESOURCESWater resources of the Badger Wash are minimal. The Underlying Mancos Shale members are not water bearing and the water quality of older Mesozoic rocks at depth is poor. Streams only flow intermittently during high precipitation events. The cobble-rich alluvial aquifer composed of lower Colorado River terraces gravels of the Grand Valley is not present in the map area. This buried water bearing cobbly deposit ends where the Colorado River has incised into Horsethief Canyon between Fruita and Mack (Butler and others, 1996). Government Highline Canal provides water to irrigate farmlands in the lower third of the quadrangle. Canal water empties into West Salt Creek, which marks the western end of irrigated farmlands in the Grand Valley of Colorado.MMI03
4MINERAL RESOURCESOil and Gas resources are present in the quadrangle (Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC)). Named oil and gas fields include portions of the Bar-X, Bidle, and Peachtree fields (ECMC). These fields were developed in the structural terrain mentioned above (Krey, 1962). For most of the oil and gas wells, the total depth was in the Entrada Sandstone and production predominantly occurred from the Dakota Sandstone and Burro Canyon Formation (Kdb) and the Entrada Sandstone (Je). These units are not exposed in the map area but are shown in the cross section. Within the Mancos Shale, the Niobrara Member may have oil and gas potential using horizontal well drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) completion techniques. There are small gravel pits in some of the mesa surfaces underlain by old gravels, but the quality is poor, being low-durability sandstone-rich gravel derived chiefly from Mesa Verde Group rocks of the Book Cliffs and locally containing channels or layers composed of mud-flow and debris-flow deposits with a clay matrix.MMI04
5GEOLOGIC HAZARDSPotential geologic hazards in the map area are primarily the risks posed by stream flooding as well as mudflow and debris flow deposition. The floors of the intermittent stream show evidence of flooding, scour, and deposition of bouldery gravel. The Mancos Shale contains bentonite and other expansive clay minerals. Clayey surficial deposits (soils in geotechnical engineering terms) derived from the shale may be expansive (swelling soils). Some silty to clayey sand deposits may also be low density and may be collapsible and settle upon wetting (hydrocompactive soils). Unimproved dirt road and 4WD tracks in the adobe badlands may become impassable when they are wet as the clay soils becomes increasingly slick, greasy, and adhere to tires and shoes. The marine shale may also be high in sulfates and may be corrosive to unprotected concrete and steel. High selenium levels and other dissolved solids have been reported in irrigation return waters in the Mancos Shale (Butler and other, 1996). Site-specific geotechnical investigations including bore holes and soil testing should be conducted for structures planned in the Mancos Shale or in clayey soils derived from the Mancos.MMI05
6PREVIOUS GEOLOGIC MAPPINGThe preparation of this map was aided by the review of previous geologic mapping conducted in the area. The geology of the Badger Wash quadrangle was previously mapped at 1:100,000 scale by Ellis and Gabaldo (1989) and at the 1:250,000 scale (1° by 2°) by Cashion (1973). Krey (1962) prepared a small-scale structural map of the area. On an adjacent 1:24,000-scale quadrangle at the southeast corner of the Badger Wash quadrangle, the geology of the Mack quadrangle was mapped by White and others (2015) as part of this multi-year mapping program in the Grand Valley by the Colorado Geological Survey. The 1:24,000-scale quadrangle adjacent to the Badger Wash quadrangle are shown in the index map on Plate 1.MMI06
7ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe bulk of the property of the Badger Wash quadrangle is federal lands administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. High-resolution orthorectified aerial photography and tax assessor land parcel data was downloaded from the Mesa County GIS Department web site. Pangaea Geospatial produced the map plates and GIS files for this publication. This map publication benefited from reviews by Ralph Shroba and Matthew Morgan of the Colorado Geological Survey.MMI07
8REFERENCESAslan, Andres, Karlstrom, K.E., Kirby, Eric, Heizler, M.T., Granger, D.E., Feathers, J.K., Hanson, P.R., and Mahan, S.A., 2019, Resolving time-space histories of Late Cenozoic bedrock incision along the Upper Colorado River, USA: Geomorphology, v. 347, p. 1-26. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106855 Ball, B.A., Cobban, W.A., Merewether, E.A., Grauch, R.I., McKinney, K.C., and Livo, K.E., 2010, Fossils, lithologies, and geophysical logs of the Mancos Shale from core hole USGS CL-1 in Montrose County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1294, 38 p. Butler, D.L., Wright, W.G., Stewart, K.C., Osmundson, B.C., Krueger, R.P., and Crabtree, D.W., 1996, Detailed study of selenium and other constituents in water, bottom sediment, soil, alfalfa, and biota associated with irrigation drainage in the Uncompahgre Project Area and in the Grand Valley, west-central Colorado, 1991-1993: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 96-4138, 136 p. Cashion, W.B., 1973, Geologic and structure map of the Grand Junction quadrangle, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-736, scale 1:250,000, URL: https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_9492.htm Cobban, W.A., Walaszczyk, I., Obradovich, J.D., and McKinney, K.C., 2006, A USGS zonal table for the Upper Cretaceous Middle Cenomanian-Maastrichtian of the Western Interior of the United States based on ammonites, inoceramids, and radiometric ages: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1250, 46 p., URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1250/pdf/OF06-1250_508.pdf Cole, R.D., Young, R.G., and Willis, G.C., 1997, The Prairie Canyon Member, a new unit of the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale, west-central Colorado and east-central Utah: Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 97-4, 23 p. Colorado Division of Water Resources, DWR Well Permit Research Viewer, URL: https://gis.colorado.gov/dnrviewer/Index.html?viewer=dwrwellpermit. Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission, gis online ECMC interactive map, URL: https://cogccmap.state.co.us/cogcc_gis_online/ Ellis, M.S., and Gabaldo, V., 1989, Geologic map and cross sections of parts of the Grand Junction and Delta 30' x 60' quadrangles, west-central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Coal Investigations Map C-124, scale 1:100,000. Forman, S.L., Tew-Todd, V., Mayhack, C. Wiest, L. A., Money, G., 2022, Late Quaternary aeolian environments, luminescence chronology and climate change for the Monahans dune field, Winkler County, West Texas, USA, Aeolian Research v. 58, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100828 Franczyk, K.J., Fouch, T.D., Johnson, R.C., Molenaar, C.M., and Cobban, W.A., 1992, Cretaceous and Tertiary paleogeographic reconstructions for the Uinta-Piceance study area, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1787-Q, 37 p. Galbraith, R.F. and Roberts, R.G., 2012, Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: An overview and some recommendations: Quaternary Geochronology, vol. 11, pp. 1-27. Gill, J.R., and Hail, W.J., Jr., 1975, Stratigraphic sections across Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale-Mesaverde Group boundary, eastern Utah and Western Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigations Chart OC-68, 1 plate. Gualtieri, J.L., 1988, Geologic map of the Westwater 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, Grand and Uinta counties, Utah and Garfield and Mesa counties, Colorado: U.S . Geological Survey Map I-1765, scale 1:100,000. Krey, M., 1962, North flank Uncompahgre Arch, Mesa and Garfield counties, Colorado, in Exploration for oil and gas in northwestern Colorado, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologist, p. 111-113 Leckie, R.M., Kirkland, J.I., and Elder, W.P., 1997, Stratigraphic framework and correlation of a principal reference section of the Mancos Shale (Upper Cretaceous), Mesa Verde, Colorado: New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook 48, p. 163-216. Liang, P. and Forman, S. L., 2019, LDAC: An Excel-based program for luminescence equivalent dose and burial age calculations. Ancient TL v. 37 (2), p. 21-40. URL: http://ancienttl.org/ATL_37-2_2019/ATL_37-2_Liang_p21-40.pdf. Livaccari, R.F. and Hodge, J., 2009, Geologic map of the Fruita quadrangle, Mesa County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open-File Report 09-04, scale 1:24,000. Machette, M.N., 1985, Calcic soils of the southwestern United States, in Weide D.L. and Faber, M.L., eds., Soils and Quaternary Geology of the Southwestern United States: Geological Society of America Special Paper v. 202, p. 1-21. Matthews, N.E., Vázquez, J.A., Calvert, A.T., 2015, Age of the Lava Creek supereruption and magma chamber assembly at Yellowstone based on 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb dating of sanidine and zircon crystals: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 16, p. 2508–2528, URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC00588 Merewether, E.A., Sawyer, D.A., and Cobban, W.A., 2006, Molluscan fossils and stratigraphic descriptions from the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale, west-central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1326, 17 p. Molenaar, C.M., and Cobban, W.A., 1991, Middle Cretaceous stratigraphy on the south and east sides of the Uinta Basin, Northeastern Utah and northwestern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1787-P, 34 p. Murray, A.S. and Wintle, A.G., 2003, The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability: Radiation Measurements, v. 37, p. 377-381. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,URL: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/climate-normals/1981-2010-normals-data Noe, D.C., White, J.L., and Nelson, Michele, 2015, Geologic map of the North Delta quadrangle, Delta County, Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-15-09, 1:24,000. Prescott, J.R. and Hutton J.T., 1994, Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: Large depth sand long-term time variations: Radiation Measurements, v. 23, p. 497-500. Scott, R.B., Harding, A.E., Hood, W.C., Cole, R.D., Livaccari, R.F., Johnson, J.B., Shroba, R.R., and Dickerson, R.P., 2001, Geologic map of Colorado National Monument and adjacent areas, Mesa County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-2740 scale: 1:24,000, URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/i2740 White, J.L., 2014, Geologic Map of the Corcoran Point Quadrangle, Mesa County, Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-14-05, 1:24,000. White, J.L., Livaccari, R.F., Hodge, J., Nelson, M., 2015, Geologic map of the Mack quadrangle, Mesa County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open-file Report 15-14, scale 1:24,000. White, J.L., Maclean, R., and Carroll, C.J., 2014, Geologic Map of the Whitewater Quadrangle, Mesa County, Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-14-09, 1:24,000. Willis, G.C., 1994, Geologic map of the Harley Dome quadrangle, Grand County, Utah, Utah Geological Survey, Map 157, 1:24,000. Wintle, A.G. and Murray, A.S., 2006, A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols: Radiation Measurement, v. 41, p. 369-391.MMI08
9TITLEGEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BADGER WASH QUADRANGLE, MESA AND GARFIELD COUNTIES, COLORADOMMI09
10AUTHORJonathan L. White and Emily A. PermanMMI10
11YEAR2024MMI11
12STATEMAP AGREEMENTThis mapping project was funded jointly by the Colorado Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey through the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program under STATEMAP agreement G22AC00302.MMI12

Database Inventory

This summary of database content is provided as a convenience to GIS analysts, reviewers, and others. It is not part of the GeMS compliance criteria.

DataSources, nonspatial table, 9 rows
DescriptionOfMapUnits, nonspatial table, 36 rows
GeoMaterialDict, nonspatial table, 101 rows
Glossary, nonspatial table, 32 rows
MiscellaneousMapInformation, nonspatial table, 12 rows
GeologicMap, feature dataset
DataSourcePolys, simple polygon feature class, 2 rows
GeologicLines, simple polyline feature class, 2 rows
CartographicLines, simple polyline feature class, 52 rows
GeochronPoints, simple point feature class, 2 rows
OrientationPoints, simple point feature class, 170 rows
MapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 427 rows
MapUnitAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 313 rows
GenericPtAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 70 rows
GenericPoints, simple point feature class, 89 rows
MapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 522 rows
ContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 1713 rows
OrientationPointsAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 167 rows
Line, simple polyline feature class, 2 rows
GeochronPointsAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 2 rows
GeologicMap_topology, topology
CrossSectionA, feature dataset
CSAMapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 45 rows
CSAContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 136 rows
CSAGeologicLines, simple polyline feature class, 2 rows
CSADHTrace, simple polyline feature class, 7 rows
CSAGenericPoints, simple point feature class, 25 rows
CSAMapUnitPolysAnno, annotation polygon feature class, 27 rows
CorrelationOfMapUnit, feature dataset
CMUMapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 26 rows
CMULines, simple polyline feature class, 38 rows
CMU_Anno, annotation polygon feature class, 20 rows